2009
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Abstract: In participants with IPMN-Br, short-term follow-up after solid organ transplant was not associated with any significant change in cyst characteristics suggesting that incidental IPMN-Br, even in the setting of immunosuppression post-transplant, can be followed conservatively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsequent increase in size within a 6-month period would mandate resection. This approach also appears to be possible in patients who are immunosuppressed following solid organ transplant [6]. Subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis of applying these guidelines compared to either immediate surgery or no surveillance has suggested this strategy to be the superior approach [7].…”
Section: Surveillance Versus Resection In Low-risk Bt-ipmnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsequent increase in size within a 6-month period would mandate resection. This approach also appears to be possible in patients who are immunosuppressed following solid organ transplant [6]. Subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis of applying these guidelines compared to either immediate surgery or no surveillance has suggested this strategy to be the superior approach [7].…”
Section: Surveillance Versus Resection In Low-risk Bt-ipmnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that only 9/82 (11%) of IPMNs exhibited an increase in cyst size (>10 mm) and 4/82 (4.9%) developed mural nodules, but none of these IPMNs developed invasive carcinomas. Recent prospective studies by Pelaez-Luna et al 33,34 revealed that malignancy was present in 9/61 (15%) of branch duct IPMNs with at least one of the consensus indications for resection (CIR; i.e., cystrelated symptoms, cyst size >30 mm, main pancreatic duct >10 mm, mural nodules, and positive cytology) and 0/16 of IPMNs without CIR, although their specifi city was low. Rautou et al 35 have reported that the only factor associated with the signs suggesting malignant transformation was an increase in cyst size to more than 5 mm during the follow-up of branch duct IPMNs.…”
Section: Natural History Of Ipmnsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recent prospective studies of the natural history of IPMNs show that branch duct IPMNs with main duct dilatation, or a mural nodule, or of cyst size >30 mm should be indications for resection, whereas asymptomatic branch duct IPMN <30 mm without main duct dilatation and without a mural nodule can be followed using periodic imaging tests. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The recommendation by the international consensus guidelines in 2006 4 has been validated in the latest prospective studies and some large retrospective studies. 36,37 However, a prospective analysis by Walsh et al 38 revealed that cyst size alone is not a reasonable risk factor for malignancy.…”
Section: Natural History Of Ipmnsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms two recent short studies. 13,14 However, the question whether IPMN in immunocompromised patients deserves a closer follow-up remains open.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%