2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/eit.2018.8500308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Classification via Statistical Features and Back-Propagation Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison with the studies that used designed neural networks and an augmented dataset, but did not test it by k-fold cross-validation, is presented in Table 5. In the literature, there are also studies that used the same database for classification with pre-trained networks [23,[35][36][37][38][39][40] or, as input, they use only tumor region or some features that are extracted from the tumor region [7,21,23,41,42]. Similarly, in several papers, researchers have modified this database prior to classification [36,[43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art-methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison with the studies that used designed neural networks and an augmented dataset, but did not test it by k-fold cross-validation, is presented in Table 5. In the literature, there are also studies that used the same database for classification with pre-trained networks [23,[35][36][37][38][39][40] or, as input, they use only tumor region or some features that are extracted from the tumor region [7,21,23,41,42]. Similarly, in several papers, researchers have modified this database prior to classification [36,[43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art-methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study claimed to achieve an accuracy measure of 98.5% on training and 84.19% for validation. The authors in [21] employed a two-dimensional discrete transform based on wavelets and Gabor filters for extraction of features of brain MRI. The study achieved an accuracy measure of 91.9% by employing the aforementioned system setup with backpropagation NN.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meningioma represented 36.3% (29,320), Gliomas 26.5% (21,200), Pituitary tumors represented nearly 16.2% (13,210) and rest of the cases belonged to other types of brain tumor such as Malignant, Medulloblastoma, and Lymphomas. The principal causes of such disease are cancer-related ailment and morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of brain disease diagnosis, firstly, the image features are extracted, and then the extracted image features are classified to complete the image classification and recognition. For example, Ismael and Abdel-Qader (2018) used Gabor filter and discrete wavelet transform to extract statistical features for brain tumor classification. Then this method used the tumor segmented as input and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) as the classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%