2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain responses evoked by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: An event-related potential study

Abstract: Background-Many recent studies have employed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to study brain-behavior relationships. However, the pulse-to-pulse neural effects of rapid delivery of multiple TMS pulses are unknown largely because of TMS-evoked electrical artifacts limiting recording of brain activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative possibility to this behavioral state-related effective connectivity account, however, is that the trial-to-trial unpredictability of the delivery of TMS in the STM condition may have produced a larger involuntary orienting response in this condition versus the Fixation condition. In tests of STM in which a 3-s-long train of 10-Hz repetitive TMS was delivered unpredictably during half of the delay periods of a block, for example, the TMS-ER to the first several pulses of the train induced a large-magnitude response at frontal midline electrodes that was not observed for the ensuing pulses of the train (Hamidi et al 2009). Inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative possibility to this behavioral state-related effective connectivity account, however, is that the trial-to-trial unpredictability of the delivery of TMS in the STM condition may have produced a larger involuntary orienting response in this condition versus the Fixation condition. In tests of STM in which a 3-s-long train of 10-Hz repetitive TMS was delivered unpredictably during half of the delay periods of a block, for example, the TMS-ER to the first several pulses of the train induced a large-magnitude response at frontal midline electrodes that was not observed for the ensuing pulses of the train (Hamidi et al 2009). Inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there are few studies where ICA has been used in artifact reduction from TMS-evoked EEG data where the artifacts are of moderate size [7,13]. In this article, ICA is introduced for first time to remove very large muscle artifacts from the TMS-evoked data arising from brain areas close to cranial muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICA is a popular signal analysis and artifact detection method in EEG and MEG recordings [3,4,10,14,16,18,[22][23][24]; it has already been successfully used in artifact reduction from the TMSevoked EEG data arising from M1, posterior parietal cortex, and postcentral gyrus stimulation [7,13], where the artifacts have been of moderate size. Note that although the brain activation and the artifacts are triggered by the same TMS impulse, they can still be considered as independent stochastic processes with no mutual interaction, and therefore, ICA is an appropriate way to separate the artifacts from the brain signals [14,18,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies have characterised both early (5 -30 ms) and later potentials (45 -300 ms) comprising several positive and negative potentials (Bonato et al, 2006;Casarotto et al, 2010;Esser et al, 2006;Komssi et al, 2004;Lioumis, Kicic, Savolainen, Makeka, & Kahkoen, 2009;Veniero, Maioli, & Miniussi, 2010). Subsequently, a handful of studies have provided evidence of TEP modulation both during and following application of plasticity-inducing NIBS protocols (Esser et al, 2006;Hamidi, Slagter, Tononi, & Postle, 2010;Huber et al, 2008;Veniero et al, 2010), suggesting that TEPs will likely prove valuable for investigating induced plastic changes within non-motor areas.…”
Section: How Do We Investigate Nibs-induced Plasticity?mentioning
confidence: 99%