1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(97)05250-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
70
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
70
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises the question of whether the determiner-noun combination in (5a) independently elicits a negativity, in comparison to preposition-determiner-noun combinations. Some studies have reported that closed class words elicit different ERPs than open class words (Neville, Mills, & Lawson, 1992;Pulvermuller, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1995), although other studies have reported no differences across classes (Münte et al, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997). Irrespectively, both articles and the prepositions in the current stimuli are closed class or functional categories, and we have no evidence that these lexical differences should yield independent ERP differences.…”
Section: Designcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…This raises the question of whether the determiner-noun combination in (5a) independently elicits a negativity, in comparison to preposition-determiner-noun combinations. Some studies have reported that closed class words elicit different ERPs than open class words (Neville, Mills, & Lawson, 1992;Pulvermuller, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer, 1995), although other studies have reported no differences across classes (Münte et al, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997). Irrespectively, both articles and the prepositions in the current stimuli are closed class or functional categories, and we have no evidence that these lexical differences should yield independent ERP differences.…”
Section: Designcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…However, this issue is discussed controversially. Results of other studies revealed that differences between word classes do not reflect qualitatively separate processing mechanisms, but rather are a function of word frequency or of frequency and length (e.g., King & Kutas, 1998;Münte, Wieringa, Weyerts, Szentkuti, Matzke, & Johannes, 2001;Osterhout, Bersick, & McKinnon, 1997).…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Word class dissociations were observed only for the patient, with more activation in Broca's area, left middle temporal cortex, and left superior parietal cortex for object naming than action naming, and more activation in left inferior parietal lobe for action naming than object naming. Osterhout et al (1997) also found no word class differences in healthy young adults' event-related potential (ERP) responses to English nouns and verbs read in passages. In contrast, Brown et al (1999), using a similar paradigm in Dutch, found a word class effect between 250 and 550 ms post-stimulus-onset, with more negativity to verbs than to nouns over all electrodes, with the difference larger over the back of the head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%