1935
DOI: 10.1037/h0056416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain mechanisms and "hypotheses."

Abstract: This paper represents a continuation of a general program of research on the problem-solving behavior of the rat. The major problem of this program was an attempt to obtain an adequate analysis of the methods an animal adopts when placed in a problem situation. In the work already reported it has been demonstrated that the rat, when placed in a novel problem-situation, progresses through a series of systematic behavior patterns, adopting one form of response, persisting in it for some time, dropping that habit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rat, Divac (1971), in one of the few studies to date investigating the behavioral effects of lesions in the frontal projection area of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (Leonard, 1969), reported deficits in spatial reversal learning following MF but not FP lesions, and it is pertinent to note that Krechevsky's (1935) "spatial hypothesis" area coincides closely with the area of parietal lesions in the present work. Also relevant are three studies showing deficits on the "closed field test of rat intelligence" with lesions essentially within the parietal area lesioned in the present work (Ain et aI., 1969;Forgays, 1952;Thomas, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In the rat, Divac (1971), in one of the few studies to date investigating the behavioral effects of lesions in the frontal projection area of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (Leonard, 1969), reported deficits in spatial reversal learning following MF but not FP lesions, and it is pertinent to note that Krechevsky's (1935) "spatial hypothesis" area coincides closely with the area of parietal lesions in the present work. Also relevant are three studies showing deficits on the "closed field test of rat intelligence" with lesions essentially within the parietal area lesioned in the present work (Ain et aI., 1969;Forgays, 1952;Thomas, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…That the impaired performances seen on these tasks following parietal lesions is not due to some general traumatic effect is indicated by the normal performances seen on the series of black-white discrimination reversals here and on a series of spatial reversals in an earlier study . A previous suggestion (Thomas & Weir) that the parietal cortex in rats may be involved in spatial behavior obviously requires qualification, although it continues to merit consideration due to decrements in maze performances following parietal lesions and to the classic findings of Krechevsky (1935).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses attempted to reveal the sequence of strategies or "hypotheses" animals employed during the course of training within problems (Krechevsky, 1935). In our previous work with the present kind of olfactory learning tasks we found that most errors that occur early in discrimination learning are errors of commission, i.e., production of R+ during presentation of S-.…”
Section: Analysis Of Learning Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%