2018
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain activity mediates the relation between emotional but not instrumental support and trait loneliness

Abstract: Loneliness results from lacking satisfied social connections. However, little is known how trait loneliness, which is a stable personal characteristic, is influenced by different types of social support (i.e. emotional and instrumental support) through the brain activity associated with loneliness. To explore these questions, data of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) of 92 healthy participants were analyzed. We identified loneliness-related brain regions by correlating participants’ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Covariates: age, gender, relationship status, and motion —Exploratory analysis —Did not completely examine the specificity of the predictive model Mwilambwe-Tshilobo et al USA [ 43 ] 942 healthy adults; Human Connectome Project 28.0 (3.5; 23–37) 54% Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion: 51.0 (8.5) Loneliness associated with dense, lower modularity (increased integration) between default, frontoparietal, attention and perceptual networks. —Exploratory analysis Yi et al USA [ 40 ] 92 healthy adults; Human Connectome Project NS (22–35) 57% Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion: 50.5 (8.6) Loneliness was positively related to the mean ALFF value within right ITG. The negative relation between emotional support and loneliness was explained by a decrease in the spontaneous neural activity within right ITG, but this pattern was not observed for instrumental support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Covariates: age, gender, relationship status, and motion —Exploratory analysis —Did not completely examine the specificity of the predictive model Mwilambwe-Tshilobo et al USA [ 43 ] 942 healthy adults; Human Connectome Project 28.0 (3.5; 23–37) 54% Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion: 51.0 (8.5) Loneliness associated with dense, lower modularity (increased integration) between default, frontoparietal, attention and perceptual networks. —Exploratory analysis Yi et al USA [ 40 ] 92 healthy adults; Human Connectome Project NS (22–35) 57% Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion: 50.5 (8.6) Loneliness was positively related to the mean ALFF value within right ITG. The negative relation between emotional support and loneliness was explained by a decrease in the spontaneous neural activity within right ITG, but this pattern was not observed for instrumental support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One investigation reported loneliness was explained equally well by whole brain static and dynamic functional connectivity, in contrast to traits like cognitive functioning, which were explained better by dynamic connectivity [ 42 ]. Another study found loneliness was linked to altered brain activity in right inferior temporal gyrus on MRI and that the neural activity mediated the relationship between loneliness and emotional support [ 40 ]. A longitudinal study reported that individuals with severe hearing impairment were lonelier and had a hypersensitive dopamine system in a SPECT scan pre- and post- amphetamine challenge, compared to people without hearing impairment [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst someone with state loneliness may desire social relations, an individual with trait loneliness may be warier. Although factors within state and trait loneliness do not always strongly correlate (Yi et al, 2018), those with high levels of trait loneliness also report high levels of state loneliness (van Roekel et al, 2018). Therefore, whilst the types of loneliness are discrete, they may converge.…”
Section: Subdivision Two: State (Or Situational) and Trait (Or Chronic) Lonelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies examined the BOLD activity of the brain at rest through resting-state functional MRI and showed that social isolation and perceived loneliness were associated with increased activity in the right central operculum, right supramarginal gyrus and between default, frontoparietal, attention and perceptual networks (Layden et al ., 2017 ; Mwilambwe-Tshilobo et al ., 2019 ). Two studies found that higher loneliness scores were associated with (i) decreased blood flow from the dorsal to the ventral attentional network, (ii) decreased flow from the affective to the visual network and (iii) low-frequency fluctuations of the activity in the inferior temporal gyrus (Tian et al ., 2017 ; Yi et al ., 2018 ). In line with these results, Feng et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%