2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2016.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bragg-edge neutron transmission strain tomography for in situ loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first demonstrate this algorithm on the classical cantilevered beam as examined previously by Wensrich et al [11] and shown in Figure 2. Under a plane-stress assumption, the Saint-Venant approximation to the resulting strain field is [16]:…”
Section: Demonstration -Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We first demonstrate this algorithm on the classical cantilevered beam as examined previously by Wensrich et al [11] and shown in Figure 2. Under a plane-stress assumption, the Saint-Venant approximation to the resulting strain field is [16]:…”
Section: Demonstration -Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured strain is the normal component in the transmission direction of the neutron beam. The success of this approach and development of instruments and associated detector technologies has prompted activity focused on solving the associated tomographic reconstruction problem [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The aim is to provide a method analogous to conventional Computed Tomography by which the full triaxial strain distribution within a sample could be reconstructed from a sufficient set of Bragg-edge strain images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach was Figure 2: Neutron spectra from [22] showing the 110 edge on a magnified scale. The wavelength is given in Angstrom = 10 −10 m. Note that the 211 edge is closer to the ideal behaviour of a step in an otherwise linear trend Figure 3: Shifted Bragg edges produce a saw tooth effect but the derivative is a histogram up to an added constant taken for axisymmetric objects by Gregg et al [13], in the general case for synthetic data by Wensrich et al [27], and experimentally for a general case by Henriks et al [14].…”
Section: Neutron Bragg Edge Strain Tomographymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The algorithm in [24] requires detailed knowledge of the sample position, center of rotation, and orientation. These were determined by matching the known sample geometry to edge height profile over all projections.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%