2009
DOI: 10.2174/1874447800903010008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Braess's Paradox and Power-Law Nonlinearities in Five-Arc and Six-Arc Two-Terminal Networks

Abstract: We extend a general network theorem of Calvert and Keady (CK) relating to the minimum number of arcs needed to guarantee the occurrence of the Braess Paradox. We rephrase the CK theorems and express our proof in the terminology of traffic networks. CK described their theorem in relation to a two-terminal network of liquid in pipes. "Approximately stated, it is: if every relationship between flow and head difference is not a power law, with the same (power) s on each arc, given at least 6 pipes, one can arrange… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could happen, even with positive travel times, if there are exactly compensating other negative costs (such as popular scenery, carefully adjusted monetary subsidies, etc). It may be a more realistic approximation for various other analogous physical networks (electrical, mechanical, and thermal [9][10][11] or water [12]), but then the analog of tolls is not obvious. A more clearly applicable analog might be a data network.…”
Section: Summary For Inelastic Demand and Power Law Congestion Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could happen, even with positive travel times, if there are exactly compensating other negative costs (such as popular scenery, carefully adjusted monetary subsidies, etc). It may be a more realistic approximation for various other analogous physical networks (electrical, mechanical, and thermal [9][10][11] or water [12]), but then the analog of tolls is not obvious. A more clearly applicable analog might be a data network.…”
Section: Summary For Inelastic Demand and Power Law Congestion Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates the robustness of the phenomenon, given that our simulations are in two dimensions and three-dimensional effects are expected to be significant in the experiments. We note that different aspects of the paradox have been considered in fluid networks, but only for macroscopic (i.e., nonmicrofluidic) systems and while modeled by ad hoc flow 5 equations [37][38][39]. Analogs of the paradox have also been studied in several other areas, including electrical, mechanical, biological, and contemporary traffic networks [40][41][42][43][44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%