2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brachial Artery Approach for Endovascular Treatment of Posterior Circulation Intracranial Vascular Disease: Technique and Application in 5 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…99 There is little in the literature specifically for brachial access in the setting of pc-ELVO. 100 Disadvantages of transbrachial or transradial access include the theoretical possibility of having to use smaller catheters as well as less operator familiarity with the technique in an acute setting.…”
Section: Intra-arterial Fibrinolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99 There is little in the literature specifically for brachial access in the setting of pc-ELVO. 100 Disadvantages of transbrachial or transradial access include the theoretical possibility of having to use smaller catheters as well as less operator familiarity with the technique in an acute setting.…”
Section: Intra-arterial Fibrinolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8) In the field of cerebral endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms or VA stenosis, the success rates of transradial or -brachial approaches are high, suggesting their efficacy. [14][15][16][17] These approaches have the following merits: direct cannulation from the subclavian artery to the VA is possible regardless of the aortic tortuosity, and a guiding catheter stays stable after insertion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transbrachial arterial access (TBA) for both angiography and interventions has been described in the neurointerventional literature when TFA cannot be performed safely for reasons such as small radial artery/sheath size ratio or due to aortic arch or supra-aortic vessel tortuosity 61–65. The larger diameter compared with the radial artery offers the advantage of placement of larger guiding catheters and devices at a cost of an increased chance of limb ischemia due to less robust collateral circulation and increased access site complications due to its deeper location within the tissues of the brachium.…”
Section: Transbrachial Arterial Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%