1999
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199905000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brace Treatment in Neuromuscular Spine Deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In contrast, Letts and colleagues (1992) used a soft Boston orthosis in the management of neuromuscular scoliosis and noticed an improvement in the scoliosis with an average of 15 degrees, while the major advantage was a marked improvement in sitting stability in 80% of patients. 10 In another study, Olafsson et al (1999) observed that mean brace-induced Cobb-angle correction was 60% with <10° curve progression during the observation time and a good brace compliance. 11 However, Mullender et al (2008) did not recommend the use of orthosis to prevent the development or progression of scoliosis in myopathic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 In contrast, Letts and colleagues (1992) used a soft Boston orthosis in the management of neuromuscular scoliosis and noticed an improvement in the scoliosis with an average of 15 degrees, while the major advantage was a marked improvement in sitting stability in 80% of patients. 10 In another study, Olafsson et al (1999) observed that mean brace-induced Cobb-angle correction was 60% with <10° curve progression during the observation time and a good brace compliance. 11 However, Mullender et al (2008) did not recommend the use of orthosis to prevent the development or progression of scoliosis in myopathic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In another study, Olafsson et al (1999) observed that mean brace-induced Cobb-angle correction was 60% with <10° curve progression during the observation time and a good brace compliance. 11 However, Mullender et al (2008) did not recommend the use of orthosis to prevent the development or progression of scoliosis in myopathic patients. They advocated the use of a sitting type orthosis for patients who reject surgery for improvement of sitting comfort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HC are often afflicted with severe spinal deformities, which have poor outcomes with brace treatments 11,12) . In these cases, good treatment outcomes have been reported with scoliosis surgery using modern instruments 3,6,8,9) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for the use of orthoses to prevent scoliotic curve progression is mixed. Some authors have suggested bracing may slow curve progression (20), especially in younger patients with curves less than 40 degrees (20,22). Other groups have reported less success (21,22) and suggest braces may be beneficial as an interim measure before definitive surgical correction.…”
Section: Non-surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%