2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ase.2017.8115708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BProVe: Tool support for business process verification

Abstract: This demo introduces BProVe, a tool supporting automated verification of Business Process models. BProVe analysis is based on a formal operational semantics defined for the BPMN 2.0 modelling language, and is provided as a freely accessible service that uses open standard formats as input data. Furthermore a plug-in for the Eclipse platform has been developed making available a tool chain supporting users in modelling and visualising, in a friendly manner, the results of the verification. Finally we have condu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain a formal verification approach for such standard, we had first to make this semantics formal in [15]. This formal semantics has been then implemented in the form of an executable interpreter in MAUDE in [17,18]. The full MAUDE implementation of our BPMN interpreter is available at https: //github.com/PROSLab/BPMNOS-Maude.…”
Section: Bpmn Operational Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to obtain a formal verification approach for such standard, we had first to make this semantics formal in [15]. This formal semantics has been then implemented in the form of an executable interpreter in MAUDE in [17,18]. The full MAUDE implementation of our BPMN interpreter is available at https: //github.com/PROSLab/BPMNOS-Maude.…”
Section: Bpmn Operational Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set the and values describing the required confidence interval (see Section 5.2) to 0.1 and 0.15, respectively. 18 We used the automatic parallelisation feature provided by MULTIVESTA [54]) using 3 cores of the machine to parallelise the simulations. Finally we defined a time limit of 600 seconds considering it as the maximum amount of time a user, adopting the development model presented in Section 3, may wait for receiving a response from the tool; we use this time limit to run our tests and to timeout the computations that exceed such limit.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work focuses on sequential patterns. Moreover, because of the similarity of web service composition and business process modelling [22], our methods can be applied to the analysis and optimisation of business processes, which would complement the existing approaches [23][24][25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 a typical usage scenario, while the interested reader can find further information on the tool and its usage in [36]. The considered scenario shows all the interactions between a User and the tool chain main components.…”
Section: Bprove Tool Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%