2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BPA and risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Metabolite measurements are important for toxicokinetic understanding of the in vivo disposition of chemicals and can be also used for human biomonitoring, as is the case for BPA. Metabolite concentrations of BPA have been frequently determined indirectly 29,30 using enzymatic deconjugation to form total BPA, that is, the sum of unconjugated and conjugated BPA. Metabolite concentrations can be indirectly obtained from the total BPA by subtracting unconjugated BPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 Metabolite measurements are important for toxicokinetic understanding of the in vivo disposition of chemicals and can be also used for human biomonitoring, as is the case for BPA. Metabolite concentrations of BPA have been frequently determined indirectly 29,30 using enzymatic deconjugation to form total BPA, that is, the sum of unconjugated and conjugated BPA. Metabolite concentrations can be indirectly obtained from the total BPA by subtracting unconjugated BPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The indirect method may have some disadvantages because of variable deconjugation recovery, leading to potential underestimation of the actual exposure of humans to environmental compounds, as demonstrated with BPA by Gerona et al (2020), although these findings have been challenged. 30 In this study, the direct method was preferred because analytical standards were available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to Gerona and colleagues’ (2020) conclusion that the indirect method underestimates total BPA concentrations, Calafat and Koch (2020) noted that proficiency testing performed by external quality assessment programs such as G-EQUAS (Erlangen, Germany) and the European Union HBM4EU of international laboratories using urine control samples spiked with known concentrations of free BPA and BPAG have consistently reported that results fall within the tolerance range ( Calafat and Koch, 2020 ). Results (7% (5 out of 70 from 30 international participants)) that were outside the tolerance range were above rather than below these limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%