1972
DOI: 10.2307/1402755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Box-Jenkins Methods: An Alternative to Econometric Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
8

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
34
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The coding was done independently (i.e., the coders did not meet each other) and it was done blindly (i.e., the coders were not aware of the hypotheses in this study). In each of the four comparisons from these studies (Vand6me 1963; Markland Naylor et al 1972) there was perfect agreement among the author and the two raters. In addition, five of the ex post prediction studies were coded (Kosobud 1970;Fair 1971;Cooper 1972;Elliott 1973;Granger and Newbold 1974).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coding was done independently (i.e., the coders did not meet each other) and it was done blindly (i.e., the coders were not aware of the hypotheses in this study). In each of the four comparisons from these studies (Vand6me 1963; Markland Naylor et al 1972) there was perfect agreement among the author and the two raters. In addition, five of the ex post prediction studies were coded (Kosobud 1970;Fair 1971;Cooper 1972;Elliott 1973;Granger and Newbold 1974).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Efforts were made to test for statistical significance where this had not been done in the published study. In general, serious difficulties were encountered; most of these studies did not provide sufficient data (e.g., Naylor, Seaks, and Wichern 1972), others failed to use comparable time periods, and still others sufferedfrom small sample sizes. The most striking result was that not one study was found where the econometric method was signijicantly more accurate.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason behind using Box and Jenkins technique is that it has been shown to give relatively accurate forecasts. The results from comparative studies conducted by Naylor et al (1972) and Nelson (1973) show that the Box and Jenkins model, although simpler, was more effective than other such contemporary econometric models.…”
Section: Methods Adoptedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ARIMA model is a time-series forecasting method which was proposed by Box and Jenkins in the early 1970s [7].ARIMA model contains three factors, p, d and q. AR is autoregressive (p), MA is moving average (q) and d is the level of differencing to stationarize the time series. The formula of the ARIMA model is:…”
Section: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (Arima) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%