1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00535682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on conditional probabilities with applications in multi-user communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
185
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to use Lemma 2 for proving Theorem 1, an important step involves controlling the size of X in Lemma 2. To this end, we use the following scalar quantizer to quantize the alphabet X i (in (13)) which is exponential in the blocklength n (cf. (14)) so that its quantized version is an alphabet whose size is polynomial in the blocklength.…”
Section: B Wringing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to use Lemma 2 for proving Theorem 1, an important step involves controlling the size of X in Lemma 2. To this end, we use the following scalar quantizer to quantize the alphabet X i (in (13)) which is exponential in the blocklength n (cf. (14)) so that its quantized version is an alphabet whose size is polynomial in the blocklength.…”
Section: B Wringing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closely related result was discovered in [3] and rediscovered in [5]: For a given number u C [0,2 n] of arbitrary subsets of an n-set the "Hamming distance 1"-boundary is minimal for the initial segment of size u, also called in short "u-th initial segment", in the H-order (of [3]), that is, if one chooses all subsets of cardinality less than n-k (k suitable) and all remaining subsets of cardinality n-k, whose complements are in the initial segment of the squashed order.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A prototype of a discrete isoperimetric inequality is the one discovered in [3], rediscovered in [5], and proved again in [6]. Here d equals the Hamming distance dH and is defined on X n • X n.…”
Section: Two Isoperimetric Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new and general method to prove strong converses was presented in [7]. It applies to many multi-user coding problems for which all classical approaches fail.…”
Section: P(y"]x")= ~ W(ytlx)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need a result of Margulis [8] in the slightly generalized form given in [7] as Lemma 4: n Lemma. Given a DMC with transmission probabilities P=I]w there is a constant c=c(w)>O such that for any n, Bc~" and x"~Y'": 1 …”
Section: Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%