1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1239(199905)9:6<333::aid-rnc408>3.3.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for uncertain matrix root‐clustering in a union of subregions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Peaucelle et al (2000), D R -regions were shown to be able to describe non-convex regions but only represented symmetrically, which motivated Bosche, Bachelier, and Mehdi (2005) to extend the concept further to consider non-symmetrical regions. On the other hand, Bachelier and Pradin (1999) developed an approach that allows specifying not only a simple convex region, but also a non-convex region, defined as a union of convex subregions. Then, Maamri, Bachelier, and Mehdi (2006) proposed a technique in order to achieve partial pole placement via aggregation in such regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Peaucelle et al (2000), D R -regions were shown to be able to describe non-convex regions but only represented symmetrically, which motivated Bosche, Bachelier, and Mehdi (2005) to extend the concept further to consider non-symmetrical regions. On the other hand, Bachelier and Pradin (1999) developed an approach that allows specifying not only a simple convex region, but also a non-convex region, defined as a union of convex subregions. Then, Maamri, Bachelier, and Mehdi (2006) proposed a technique in order to achieve partial pole placement via aggregation in such regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without any assumption on the matrix R 11 , D R -regions are not convex, but with R 11 0, D R -regions become a slight modification of the characterization provided by LMI regions (Rotondo, 2017). In Bachelier and Pradin (1999), non-convex regions were considered as unions of convex subregions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%