2006
DOI: 10.1137/s036301290444349x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Matrix Root-Clustering Analysis through Extended KYP Lemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first comment is that this robust Hurwitz stability test can be easily extended to many other performances tests such as H ∞ level [1], pole clustering constraints in convex regions i. e. D-stability [8,17,32] or even pole clustering constraints in non convex regions [3,4,5]. Indeed, all those performances have been expressed in terms of inequalities such as (1) or (54).…”
Section: Discussion and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first comment is that this robust Hurwitz stability test can be easily extended to many other performances tests such as H ∞ level [1], pole clustering constraints in convex regions i. e. D-stability [8,17,32] or even pole clustering constraints in non convex regions [3,4,5]. Indeed, all those performances have been expressed in terms of inequalities such as (1) or (54).…”
Section: Discussion and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is no constraint on the sign definiteness of P. This is due to the fact that the generalized KYP lemma does not invoke stability. In other words, we can have a FDI which does not induce stability and therefore P can be non-positive (see Bachelier et al 2004;Bachelier and Mehdi 2006 for more details on this issue). However, it can be easily shown that the LMI (18) in the above lemma is in fact a constraint on H ∞ norm and hence we have to impose stability because H ∞ -norm is defined (and makes sense) for stable transfer functions only.…”
Section: Stability Along the Pass Over The Finite Frequency Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…,h are 2 × 2 Hermitian matrices. This kind of description is borrowed from [3] following insights proposed in [11], [10]. Special sets can be emphasized:…”
Section: Formulation Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, it is possible to apply the generalized KalmanPopov-Yakubovich (KYP) lemma proposed in [10] (yet another application of a generalized version of the Sprocedure), with slight adaptations as in [3] (in order to encompass the caseh > 1), to claim that (15) holds if and only if there exist an Hermitian matrix P andh Hermitian positive definite matrices Q h , h = 1, . .…”
Section: Some "Augmented Lft" Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation