2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary time-varying feedbacks for fixed-time stabilization of constant-parameter reaction–diffusion systems

Abstract: In this paper, the problem of fixed-time stabilization of constant-parameter reaction-diffusion partial differential equations by means of continuous boundary time-varying feedbacks is considered. Moreover, the time of convergence can be prescribed in the design. The design of time-varying feedbacks is carried out based on the backstepping approach. Using a suitable target system with a time varying-coefficient, one can state that the resulting kernel of the backstepping transformation is timevarying and rende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the numerical method is introduced to solve them, which expands the choice range of system parameters and kernel PDEs (not limited to kernel PDEs with explicit solutions). (2) Robustness to a small perturbation in diffusion coefficients: The most striking feature in stability robustness analysis is that we prove the robustly Mittag-Leffler stability of the closed-loop system with the proposed output feedback controller, which is also nontrivial for integer-order PDE systems [20], [21].…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, the numerical method is introduced to solve them, which expands the choice range of system parameters and kernel PDEs (not limited to kernel PDEs with explicit solutions). (2) Robustness to a small perturbation in diffusion coefficients: The most striking feature in stability robustness analysis is that we prove the robustly Mittag-Leffler stability of the closed-loop system with the proposed output feedback controller, which is also nontrivial for integer-order PDE systems [20], [21].…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For infinite dimensional systems, namely partial differential equations (PDEs), these non-asymptotic concepts have been of great interest and some contributions can be highlighted for 1D hyperbolic and parabolic PDEs: see e.g. [19], [5], [2], [5], [7], [6], [8], [22], [20]. For systems in both finite and infinite dimension, the need to meet some performance, time constraints and precision has highly motivated the stabilization and estimation in finite, fixed and prescribedtime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scope of parabolic distributed parameter systems, the finite-time control has become a hot research area [11][12][13][14]. In contrast to the lumped parameter systems, the problems of the fixed-time control and the fixed-time observer design of parabolic distributed parameter systems have not achieved a sufficient level of maturity [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the fixed-time concept of lumped parameter systems was extended to the distributed parameter systems which are modeled by partial differential equations. For example, in Espitia et al [16], the problem of the boundary state feedback for fixed-time stabilisation of a distributed parameter system with constants coefficient by backstepping methods is presented based on Song et al [7] and Coron and Nguyen [13]. On the basis of Smyshlyaev and Krstic [31], the explicit representation of solution of the kernel equations is carried out by employing the generalised Lagueree polynomials and the modified Bessel function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%