2021
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1889467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary spanning at work placements: challenges to overcome, and ways to learn in preparation for early career engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for the relative prominence of this activity derives from the distributed nature of expertise: knowledge is distributed across numerous participants, both engineers and others (Trevelyan, 2010a). Professional engineers frequently engage with others across organisational and discipline boundaries (Asplund & Flening, 2021;Jesiek et al, 2018;Jesiek et al, 2021) and also adopt persuasive communication practices to secure resources and advocate for particular interpretations of evidence (Coso Strong et al, 2022). At the same time, many engineers regard this socio-technical activity as 'non-technical' or 'not real engineering', even as an interruption to their 'real engineering' work (Bailyn & Lynch, 1983;Perlow, 1999;Perlow & Bailyn, 1997).…”
Section: Socio-technical Aspects Of Engineering Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for the relative prominence of this activity derives from the distributed nature of expertise: knowledge is distributed across numerous participants, both engineers and others (Trevelyan, 2010a). Professional engineers frequently engage with others across organisational and discipline boundaries (Asplund & Flening, 2021;Jesiek et al, 2018;Jesiek et al, 2021) and also adopt persuasive communication practices to secure resources and advocate for particular interpretations of evidence (Coso Strong et al, 2022). At the same time, many engineers regard this socio-technical activity as 'non-technical' or 'not real engineering', even as an interruption to their 'real engineering' work (Bailyn & Lynch, 1983;Perlow, 1999;Perlow & Bailyn, 1997).…”
Section: Socio-technical Aspects Of Engineering Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation ecosystems are thus likely conducive to collaboration models in which firms e.g., wait with engaging in research and rather set up collaboration suitable for second-cycle capstone or thesis courses [12], [14]. In this way firms combine the best of two worlds as they get tailor-made advice on how to use cutting-edge technology [15], [16] without spending a large effort themselves [17]. While academia ideally wants to engage on research, this way of also enabling second-cycle students to learn from best practice in an industrial context is increasingly appreciated in education [18], [19].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all second-cycle students will have the necessary skills to seamlessly fulfill requirements from both academia and industry. Particularly, when a firm wants to make use of student placements to explore what is, to them, unknown technology, it might require students who are accomplished boundary spanners [17]. In other words, students who are able to bridge boundaries, in this case organisational boundaries between academia and industry, to bring together distinct networks and expectations [22].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are still many that there are still many students who lack motivation for many reasons, including students not liking the way their teachers teach at school or their instructors during internships, students who do not like lessons, lack of parental attention, bad associations, etc. Thus, the teacher must always provide motivation as well as be a student role model because this is the main capital for students to determine their careers (Asplund & Flening, 2022;Huo, 2023). Educators who are motivated tend to be able to achieve the expected learning goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%