2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1061920809010026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary relations and generalized resolvents of symmetric operators

Abstract: The Kre\u{\i}n-Naimark formula provides a parametrization of all selfadjoint exit space extensions of a, not necessarily densely defined, symmetric operator, in terms of maximal dissipative (in $\dC_+$) holomorphic linear relations on the parameter space (the so-called Nevanlinna families). The new notion of a boundary relation makes it possible to interpret these parameter families as Weyl families of boundary relations and to establish a simple coupling method to construct the generalized resolvents from the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(128 reference statements)
1
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2) In the case H 1 = H 0 =: H the class R(H) := R(H, H) coincides with the known class of Nevanlinna functions τ (·) : C \ R → C(H) (see for instance [6]) and (2.13) takes the form 16) where…”
Section: Holomorphic Operator Pairs Recall That a Holomorphic Operatmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) In the case H 1 = H 0 =: H the class R(H) := R(H, H) coincides with the known class of Nevanlinna functions τ (·) : C \ R → C(H) (see for instance [6]) and (2.13) takes the form 16) where…”
Section: Holomorphic Operator Pairs Recall That a Holomorphic Operatmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…More precisely this means that the collection Π = {H, Γ 0 , Γ 1 } is a boundary triplet (boundary value space) for A * in the sense of [9]. In this case the relationsObserve also that for a boundary triplet Π Proposition 2.6 follows from the Π-admissibility criterion obtained in [5,6].be an interval on the real axis (in the case b < ∞ the point b may or may not belong to ∆), let H be a separable Hilbert space and letbe a differential expression of an even order 2n with smooth enough operator-valued. Denote by y [k] (·), k = 0 ÷ 2n the quasi-derivatives of a vector-function y(·) : ∆ → H, corresponding to the expression (2.26) and let D(l) be the set of functions y(·) for which this expression makes sense [20,21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our standard references for the theory of boundary triples are [DHMdS06] and the survey article [DHMdS09]. There also some basic notations and results about linear relations can be found.…”
Section: Boundary Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an account on boundary control systems dealt with in the literature, we refer the reader to [1,15,16,22,29,31,34,35], where also strategies from the theory of selfadjoint extensions of symmetric operators come into play, [3,4,7,28,26]. As a first illustrative example of boundary control systems we discuss in Subsection 5.1 the notion of port-Hamiltonian systems as introduced in [10], also see [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, in order to discuss boundary control systems in an operatortheoretic framework, the concept of boundary triples is used, see e.g. [16,3,4,7], we also refer to [26,28], where in [26] a unified perspective is given. A boundary triple is a symmetric operator S defined in a Hilbert space H and two continuous linear operators…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%