12th Aeroacoustic Conference 1989
DOI: 10.2514/6.1989-1109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer receptivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was consistent with the findings of Kerschen 54 and Parekh et al 55  Different wavelengths were evident in the boundary-layer response. Signals at the T-S wavelength were dominant near the wall, while toward the edge of the boundary layer, disturbances of the freestream convective wavelength were observed.…”
Section: Dns Validationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This was consistent with the findings of Kerschen 54 and Parekh et al 55  Different wavelengths were evident in the boundary-layer response. Signals at the T-S wavelength were dominant near the wall, while toward the edge of the boundary layer, disturbances of the freestream convective wavelength were observed.…”
Section: Dns Validationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Receptivity establishes the initial conditions of disturbance amplitude, frequency, and phase for the breakdown of laminar (Morkovin 1969;Saric et al 2002). Reviews of different receptivity mechanisms are given by Goldstein & Hultgren (1989); Kerschen (1989); Heinrich et al (1988);Choudhari & Streett (1994);Crouch (1994); Nishioka & Morkovin (1986); Kozlov & Ryzhov (1990);Wlezien (1994); Saric et al (2002); Kachanov (2000). The early theoretical work of Goldstein ( , 1985; Zavol'skii et al (1983);Ruban (1985) solidified the mechanisms by which long-wavelength freestream disturbances at a particular frequency are converted to a wavelength commensurate with the boundary-instability wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early theoretical work of Goldstein ( , 1985; Zavol'skii et al (1983);Ruban (1985) solidified the mechanisms by which long-wavelength freestream disturbances at a particular frequency are converted to a wavelength commensurate with the boundary-instability wave. From a theoretical, numerical and experimental points of view the receptivity mechanism of isolated small height roughness is well understood (Gaster 1965;Murdock 1980;Kerschen 1989Kerschen , 1990Dietz 1999;Wu 2001;Saric et al 2002). The receptivity mechanism shows that the deviation on the length scale of eigen modes from a smooth surface can excite T-S waves by interacting with free-stream disturbances or acoustic noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on various 2D and 3D streamwise-localised surface roughness elements resulting in excitation of various 2D and 3D non-stationary instability modes (such as TS modes, crossflow modes, Görtler modes, etc.) (Gaster 1965;Murdock 1980;Goldstein 1983;Ruban 1984;Goldstein 1985;Goldstein & Hultgren 1987;Kerschen 1989Kerschen , 1990Hall 1990;Denier, Hall & Seddougui 1991;Bassom & Hall 1994;Choudhari 1994;Saric 1994;Bassom & Seddougui 1995;Duck, Ruban & Zhikharev 1996;Dietz 1999;Wu 2001b;Saric et al 2002;Templelmann 2011). The receptivity mechanism shows that the deviation on the length scale of eigenmodes from a smooth surface can excite TS waves by interacting with free-stream disturbances or acoustic noise.…”
Section: Motivation Behind the Study Of Steps In Boundary Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%