45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptivity: The Inspiration of Mark Morkovin (Invited)

Abstract: This paper provides a review of the current findings in receptivity for subsonic/transonic flows, including a discussion of the origin of the concept via Mark Morkovin, a remarkable aeronautical engineer, educator, and colleague. Disturbances external to the boundary layer -whether freestream sound or vorticity -can interact with surface roughness, the leading edge, or other inhomogeneities and enter the boundary layer as steady and/or unsteady fluctuations of the basic state. This process establishes the init… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An optimisation-based, non-modal approach (Schmid 2007) and a multiple-scales approach (Zuccher & Luchini 2014) have also been proposed. The reader is directed to Saric, Reed & Kerschen (2002) and Reed & Saric (2015) for detailed reviews of investigations carried out in the field of receptivity. From now on, we will mainly focus on the specificities of the acoustic receptivity problem in subsonic flow conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimisation-based, non-modal approach (Schmid 2007) and a multiple-scales approach (Zuccher & Luchini 2014) have also been proposed. The reader is directed to Saric, Reed & Kerschen (2002) and Reed & Saric (2015) for detailed reviews of investigations carried out in the field of receptivity. From now on, we will mainly focus on the specificities of the acoustic receptivity problem in subsonic flow conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become widely accepted that for Tu smaller than approximately 0.1 %, transition occurs as a result of the excitation of Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) waves through receptivity, i.e. the mechanism by which disturbances penetrate the boundary layer and become unstable (Goldstein 1983;Ruban 1984Ruban , 1985Goldstein 1985;Reed, Reshotko & Saric 2015). For Tu larger than approximately 1 %, transition instead occurs earlier and the TS-wave scenario only plays a secondary role.…”
Section: Boundary-layer Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receptivity is the process by which such disturbances couple to produce the initial disturbance amplitudes within the boundary layer which then grow and eventually break down to turbulence. Reed & Saric (2015) provides historical review of the concept of receptivity as well as a summary of modern progress in receptivity understanding for subsonic/transonic flight regimes. As noted before, traveling crossflow is predicted to have higher growth rates than its stationary counterpart but is not observed to be the dominant mechanism in flows with a low disturbance environment.…”
Section: Crossflow Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semicircular arc which defines the nosetip results in at a discontinuity in curvature at the junction between the nosetip and the elliptic cone frustum (Choudhari et al, 2009). Such discontinuity has been shown to be a source of receptivity in low-speed flows (Lin et al, 1992;Saric et al, 2002;Reed & Saric, 2015). Instead of a circular arc, the nosetip of the model constructed and utilized in this campaign is defined by a modified super ellipse which eliminates this discontinuity.…”
Section: Elliptic Nose Tipmentioning
confidence: 99%