“…Where 𝑢 𝑐 (𝑡) is the control signal input and 𝑦(𝑡) is the system output. As per the equivalent control technique, the control signal 𝑢 𝑐 (𝑡) can be stated as [23],…”
Section: Sliding Mode Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where 1 and 2 are positive real surface parameters and these gain parameters define the slope of the sliding manifold. The convergence of this set of equations can be demonstrated using the lyapunov energy function V [23], [26].…”
Sliding mode control is a nonlinear, robust control that is having better load disturbance rejection capability, less parameter sensitivity and fast dynamic response. Conventional sliding mode control introduces high chattering that can degrade the induction motor (IM) drive system responses. Hence, a quasi-sliding mode controller (Q-SMC) using a hyperbolic tangent function coupled with equivalent control is designed for robust speed control of vector-controlled IM drive in this work. This work focuses on the effect of variation of the switching function parameters of the Q-SMC on the performance of the drive. Extensive simulations are performed using MATLAB/Simulink software, and the switching function parameters are adjusted across a wide range and its impact on motor performance is studied qualitatively and quantitatively, with accompanying graphical results and various transient parameters. It is observed that a Q-SMC controller with a larger boundary layer width has less overshoot, less steady-state error, and a lower current THD. It is also observed that even though a high gain Q-SMC controller responds quickly, the percentage overshoot for high gain systems is likewise large. Hence, if the boundary layer width and switching gain parameters are optimized, a Q-SMC speed controller is a promising choice for a high-performance IM drive.
“…Where 𝑢 𝑐 (𝑡) is the control signal input and 𝑦(𝑡) is the system output. As per the equivalent control technique, the control signal 𝑢 𝑐 (𝑡) can be stated as [23],…”
Section: Sliding Mode Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where 1 and 2 are positive real surface parameters and these gain parameters define the slope of the sliding manifold. The convergence of this set of equations can be demonstrated using the lyapunov energy function V [23], [26].…”
Sliding mode control is a nonlinear, robust control that is having better load disturbance rejection capability, less parameter sensitivity and fast dynamic response. Conventional sliding mode control introduces high chattering that can degrade the induction motor (IM) drive system responses. Hence, a quasi-sliding mode controller (Q-SMC) using a hyperbolic tangent function coupled with equivalent control is designed for robust speed control of vector-controlled IM drive in this work. This work focuses on the effect of variation of the switching function parameters of the Q-SMC on the performance of the drive. Extensive simulations are performed using MATLAB/Simulink software, and the switching function parameters are adjusted across a wide range and its impact on motor performance is studied qualitatively and quantitatively, with accompanying graphical results and various transient parameters. It is observed that a Q-SMC controller with a larger boundary layer width has less overshoot, less steady-state error, and a lower current THD. It is also observed that even though a high gain Q-SMC controller responds quickly, the percentage overshoot for high gain systems is likewise large. Hence, if the boundary layer width and switching gain parameters are optimized, a Q-SMC speed controller is a promising choice for a high-performance IM drive.
“…Generally, electric motors can be classified as DC, induction and synchronous motor. Among them, induction motor is rugged, reliable, low maintenance, less expensive, and widely used in industrial electric drives and automation drive system [15]. The control strategies implemented for drive systems are scalar control and vector control.…”
<span lang="EN-US">Poor performance of the motor drive system is caused when the direct current-link (DC-link) capacitor voltages of the inverter are not sufficiently generated. This is mainly because of the various load torque changes and input voltage fluctuation. The qZ-source inverter operates with a fully shoot-through technique. This technique causes mismatching between the upper and lower DC-link capacitor voltages. Without capacitor voltage-balancing function, the desired DC-link capacitor voltages could not be provided or maintained when there are load and speed changes. A Sawtooth carrier-based simple boost triple-sixty-degree (TSD) pulse width modulation (PWM) technique is used to drive the qZ-source T-type inverter because this technique can give a more significant boost DC-link voltage than a traditional simple boost PWM technique. Proportional integral (PI) controller is applied for the DC-link voltage controller to achieve the fast response and less steady-state error. The simulation model was constructed for a 4 kW, 400 V, 1,400 rpm induction motor (IM) drive system used in rolling mill using MATLAB/Simulink with and without voltage balancing function. As a result, DC-link voltages of the qZ-source T-type inverter fed the induction motor drive system could be controlled using a capacitor voltage-balancing function and the output power of the motor from the simulation result is approximately equal to 4 kW.</span>
“…As a result, designing and implementing this system is simple. sliding mode control (SMC) and other robust and stable control methods must be incorporated to ensure their robustness and stability [1]. Because the use of a 3-phase induction motor is becoming more common, research on speed regulation in 3-phase induction motors is being more widely studied [2].…”
To achieve optimum torque per amp, we retain the angle of the stator-current-vector with respect to the rotor-flux at 90 degrees, rather than controlling the amplitude of the stator-current-vector. Without or with the load torque, the proportional integral (PI) controller produced better results in the speed control loop. A controller is required to maintain a consistent speed and improve system performance as the load changes. This work develops an auto-tuning PI speed controller for 3-phase permanent-magn et synchronous motors using field oriented algorithm. The 3-phase voltage from the grid is converted to DC through a transformer and a grid-side rectifier. The DC voltage is converted back into AC through a machine-side inverter, which drives the motor with time-varying loud. The objective of field oriented control (FOC) in this work is to control the semiconductor switches in the machine-side power inverter to achieve the desired torque and flux. The stator-currents are measured and fed into the flux observer to obtain the direct-quadrature-zero (DQ-axis) current, the rotor magn etizing current, and the angle of the synchronously rotating reference frame. The results show that the motor's speed response has an earlier transient response and a less steady-state inaccuracy after tuning the controllers during acceleration and torque load adjustments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.