2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01511-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottleneck size and selection level reproducibly impact evolution of antibiotic resistance

Abstract: During antibiotic treatment, the evolution of bacterial pathogens is fundamentally affected by bottlenecks and varying selection levels imposed by the drugs. Bottlenecks—that is, reductions in bacterial population size—lead to an increased influence of random effects (genetic drift) during bacterial evolution, and varying antibiotic concentrations during treatment may favour distinct resistance variants. Both aspects influence the process of bacterial evolution during antibiotic therapy and thereby treatment o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(60 reference statements)
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the proposed modelling approach is that it allows for AMR to be represented as a continuous quantitative trait, describing the level of resistance of the bacterial population termed quantitative AMR (qAMR) in [3]. Moreover, consistent with recent experimental evidence [2] integro-differential equations take into account both, the dynamics of the bacterial population density, referred to as "bottleneck size" in [2] as well as the evolution of its level of resistance due to drug-induced selection.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of the proposed modelling approach is that it allows for AMR to be represented as a continuous quantitative trait, describing the level of resistance of the bacterial population termed quantitative AMR (qAMR) in [3]. Moreover, consistent with recent experimental evidence [2] integro-differential equations take into account both, the dynamics of the bacterial population density, referred to as "bottleneck size" in [2] as well as the evolution of its level of resistance due to drug-induced selection.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The latter has been referred to as within-host evolution of antimicrobial resistance and studied in infectious disease settings such as Tuberculosis [1]. During antibiotic treatment for example within-host evolutionary AMR dynamics plays an important role [2] and presents significant challenges in terms of optimizing treatment dosage. The study by Djidjou-Demasse et al [3] contributes to addressing such challenges by developing a modelling approach that utilizes integro-differential equations to mathematically capture continuity in the space of the bacterial resistance levels.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of our study is the “random” nature of mutations and transcriptomic and phenotypic changes, which might present differently upon repetition of the experiment. Moreover, during (experimental) evolution, numerous factors, such as variations in population size and selection pressure ( 113 ), might directly influence adaptational events. However, this does not diminish the significance of our findings but underlines the diversity of resistance evolution, compensation, and underlying processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results shed light on the importance of selective bottlenecks in shaping the evolutionary trajectories of emerging microbial symbionts. Most theoretical 31,32 and experimental [33][34][35][36][37][38] works on the influence of bottlenecks on microbial adaptation have focused on non-selective bottlenecks that randomly purge genetic diversity and reduce the efficiency of natural selection. Yet, another aspect of bottlenecks emerges when considering that transmission and host colonization can be, at least partially, dependent on microbial genotype, prompting us to consider infection bottlenecks as selective events 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%