Residual liver function is the major factor influencing the outcome of patients after hepatectomy and can be predicted preoperatively by a combination of LiMAx and CT volumetry.

No abstract

The androgen receptor (AR) has been shown to be of potential prognostic importance in retrospective cohorts. We evaluated immunohistochemical AR expression on a tissue microarray of 673 core biopsies from primary breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) chemotherapy in the prospective GeparTrio phase-III trial. AR was detected in 53.2% of tumours. Lowest AR expression was detected in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) with 21.2%. Highest AR expression was observed in Luminal A-like tumours with 67%. In AR-positive tumours, pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 12.8% compared to 25.4% in AR-negative tumours (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, AR independently predicted pCR (OR 1.86; 95% CI [1.16-2.79] P = 0.0086). Overall patients with an AR-positive tumour had a significant better disease-free (DFS) (AR-positive 78.9% vs. AR-negative 72.5%; log-rank P = 0.0329) and overall survival (OS) (88.8% vs. 82.7%; log-rank P = 0.0234) than those with AR-negative tumours. Stratified analysis revealed that in the TNBC subgroup, but not in the other subgroups defined by ER, PgR and HER2, AR expression predicted a better DFS (AR-positive 85.7% vs. AR-negative 65.5% log-rank P = 0.0544) and OS (95.2% vs. 76.2%; log-rank P = 0.0355). Within the non-pCR subgroup, AR positivity selected a group with a significant better DFS (P = 0.045) and OS (0.021) but not within the pCR group. Patients with an AR-negative tumour have a higher chance of achieving a pCR than those with an AR-positive one. But, patients with AR-positive tumours have a better survival especially if they did not achieve a pCR.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is the rate-limiting enzyme in prostanoid biosynthesis and is involved in tumor progression. We investigated expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in cell lines and tumors from ovarian carcinomas. Expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein was detectable in three of five ovarian carcinoma cell lines and was inducible by interleukin-1␤ or phorbolester in a subset of cell lines. Prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) production could be inhibited by the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398. In malignant ascites of ovarian carcinomas significantly increased levels of PGE 2 were found compared to other carcinomas or nonmalignant ascites (P ‫؍‬ 0.03). We investigated expression of COX-2 by immunohistochemistry in 117 ovarian surface epithelial tumors. Expression of COX-2 was detected in 42% of 86 ovarian carcinomas and in 37% of 19 low malignant potential tumors, but not in 12 cystadenomas or 2 normal ovaries. Expression of COX-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry in 75% of 75 invasive ovarian carcinomas and in 75% of 16 low malignant potential tumors, whereas 2 samples from normal ovaries and 8 cystadenomas were positive for COX-1. In univariate survival analysis of invasive carcinomas, expression of COX-2 was associated with a significantly reduced median survival time (log rank test, P ‫؍‬ 0.04). For patients younger than 60 years of age, this association was even more significant (P < 0.004). In contrast, expression of COX-1 was no prognostic parameter (P ‫؍‬ 0.89). There was no significant correlation between COX-2 or COX-1 expression and other clinicopathological markers. In multivariate analysis expression of COX-2 was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival (relative risk, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.38 to 5.47). Our data indicate that COX-2 expression is an independent prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. Based on the results of this study, it would be interesting to