2011
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01041.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both visual and idiothetic cues contribute to head direction cell stability during navigation along complex routes

Abstract: Successful navigation requires a constantly updated neural representation of directional heading, which is conveyed by head direction (HD) cells. The HD signal is predominantly controlled by visual landmarks, but when familiar landmarks are unavailable, self-motion cues are able to control the HD signal via path integration. Previous studies of the relationship between HD cell activity and path integration have been limited to two or more arenas located in the same room, a drawback for interpretation because t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hippocampal place cells are also closely coupled to head-direction cells, and hippocampal spatial representation is functionally related to the directional system (Knierim et al, 1995;Knierim et al, 1998). From external sensory signals, visual (landmark) information is the most potent source maintaining and updating activity of head-direction cells (Yoder et al, 2011a). The current hypothesis of how visual landmark cues control directional tuning suggests that the postsubiculum (Goodridge and Taube, 1997) and the retrosplenial cortex (Clark et al, 2010) might transfer visual landmark information to spatial signals within the limbic system (Yoder et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Integration Of Internal Idiothetic and External Sensory Signalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Hippocampal place cells are also closely coupled to head-direction cells, and hippocampal spatial representation is functionally related to the directional system (Knierim et al, 1995;Knierim et al, 1998). From external sensory signals, visual (landmark) information is the most potent source maintaining and updating activity of head-direction cells (Yoder et al, 2011a). The current hypothesis of how visual landmark cues control directional tuning suggests that the postsubiculum (Goodridge and Taube, 1997) and the retrosplenial cortex (Clark et al, 2010) might transfer visual landmark information to spatial signals within the limbic system (Yoder et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Integration Of Internal Idiothetic and External Sensory Signalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Control by landmarks appears to be predominantly guided by cues located in the distal background of the environment (Yoganarasimha et al, 2006;Zugaro et al, 2001). Further, the preferred direction of anterodorsal thalamic cells can be maintained in the absence of visual information and when entering novel environments, suggesting that self-movement cues (e.g., vestibular, motor, and proprioceptive stimuli) contribute to the stability of directional tuning (Goodridge et al, 1998;Yoder et al, 2011b). Thus, the anterodorsal thalamus has a pivotal position between self-motion and visual systems to provide a coherent percept of spatial orientation in an environment in relation to distal landmarks.…”
Section: Anterior-lateral Thalamus and Electrophysiology In Behaving mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anterior thalamus receives projections from the mammillary nuclei, which process visual-spatial and self-movement information (Taube, 2007;Yoder et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Unanswered Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of behavior is akin to problem solving, and has been studied primarily in individuals rather than groups. For example, maze-solving has been studied in many taxa including rats (Mulder et al, 2004;Yoder et al, 2011) and single-celled slime molds (Nakagaki et al, 2000;Reid and Beekman, 2013;Reid et al, 2012). Groups making serial decisions face the additional challenge of maintaining consensus -defined as agreeing on a single option (Sumpter and Pratt, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%