2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

Abstract: Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
145
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
145
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In this regard, the therapeutic approach to earlier-stage multiple myeloma has changed substantially in recent decades. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] However, the current belief is that even with aggressive therapy, the risk of progression to ESRD is high, recovery of renal function is low, and survival time on dialysis therapy is very short. 12 As the detection and treatment of multiple myeloma continues to evolve, it seems natural to question whether reductions in associated ESRD have occurred, and if so, among which demographic subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In this regard, the therapeutic approach to earlier-stage multiple myeloma has changed substantially in recent decades. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] However, the current belief is that even with aggressive therapy, the risk of progression to ESRD is high, recovery of renal function is low, and survival time on dialysis therapy is very short. 12 As the detection and treatment of multiple myeloma continues to evolve, it seems natural to question whether reductions in associated ESRD have occurred, and if so, among which demographic subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Increases in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been demonstrated in some trials of maintenance therapy, 4-6 but others have reported improved PFS with no corresponding improvement in OS. [1][2][3] The lack of OS benefit may be due to crossover and insufficient follow-up, as well as the fact that these trials were not powered to detect differences in OS between treatment groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFS varied from 31-37 months versus 24 months for the VISTA trial. The median cumulative bortezomib dose delivered was similar in these trials, 20,21 indicating that a lower dose in induction treatment reduces discontinuation rate allowing for longer treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%