2015
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.120790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of maintenance therapy on subsequent treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: use of "progression-free survival 2" as a clinical trial end-point

Abstract: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR © F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o n

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of patients receiving bortezomib-based second-line therapy was 53% in the FIRST trial 14 and 31% in the MM-015 trial. 15 Among 543 patients who experienced first progression, 44% had evidence of CRAB criteria, which is similar to our cohort in which a total of 48% were found to have CP with or without EM disease. They demonstrated a significantly lower post-progression OS in patients with morbid relapse compared to those with asymptomatic relapse (median OS, 23 vs 39 months, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The proportion of patients receiving bortezomib-based second-line therapy was 53% in the FIRST trial 14 and 31% in the MM-015 trial. 15 Among 543 patients who experienced first progression, 44% had evidence of CRAB criteria, which is similar to our cohort in which a total of 48% were found to have CP with or without EM disease. They demonstrated a significantly lower post-progression OS in patients with morbid relapse compared to those with asymptomatic relapse (median OS, 23 vs 39 months, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Time from start of treatment to serological or symptomatic progressive disease, or death, whichever occurred first, defined progression‐free survival (PFS). To investigate aggressiveness of 1st relapse and impact of first‐line therapy on future cause of the disease, we also analyzed PFS‐2, as described previously . Patients alive and without disease progression at the time of last follow‐up were censored in the respective analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, biomodulatory therapies are increasingly available, including master modifiers, affecting particularly progression-free survival 2 (PFS2). That means that pro-anakoinotic therapies administered as pre-treatments, influence the outcome of subsequent therapies, contrasting tumor progression (58,142,161,162). Pro-anakoinotic therapies lead to long-lasting responses through long-lasting changes in tumor tissue and by modifications of the tumors' communications-mediated system state (Figures 2, 3).…”
Section: Perspectives Anakoinosis: Diversifying Non-curative Carementioning
confidence: 99%