2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boron, sulphur and copper isotope systematics in the orogenic gold deposits of the Archaean Hattu schist belt, eastern Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For another sample, trace elements were additionally analyzed by ICP-MS at the University of Cape Town (Table 2). One sample was analyzed for S isotopes using laser ICP-MS at the Geological Survey of Finland (see Molnár et al 2016 for analytical details). In another sample, we determined Sr isotopes in plagioclase, also by laser ICP-MS in Finland (see Yang et al 2013 for analytical details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another sample, trace elements were additionally analyzed by ICP-MS at the University of Cape Town (Table 2). One sample was analyzed for S isotopes using laser ICP-MS at the Geological Survey of Finland (see Molnár et al 2016 for analytical details). In another sample, we determined Sr isotopes in plagioclase, also by laser ICP-MS in Finland (see Yang et al 2013 for analytical details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for these reasons that the use of stable B-isotopes in tourmaline has become well established in the study of ore deposits (e.g. Palmer and Slack, 1989;Xavier et al, 2008;Garda et al, 2009;Slack and Trumbull, 2011;Tornos et al, 2012;Duncan et al, 2014;Molnár et al, 2016). While boron isotope analysis by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) requires complete chemical dissolution of a bulk tourmaline sample, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) allows for texturally resolved measurement of δ 11 B in tourmaline at levels of precision that allow detailed analysis of fluid source reservoirs in relation to the mineral paragenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this shift between the two studies on the Athabasca Basin is that Mercadier et al [33] did not use matrix-match standards (but elbaite standard) while dravite standards were used by Adlakha et al [32] and in this study. It is now well documented that matrix-dependent mass fractionation during SIMS analysis of boron isotopes in tourmaline could be significant [51,66,67]. Whether the data of Mercadier et al [33] should be corrected significantly and, if so, determining the magnitude of the correction is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Unconformity-related Deposits Of the Allimentioning
confidence: 86%