2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4989676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boron atomic-scale mapping in advanced microelectronics by atom probe tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is used to measure B in SiGe, but performing SIMS on a full-build device is very tricky if even possible. As a result, SIMS is usually performed on simplified three-dimensional structures (Kambham et al, 2011; Martin et al, 2016; Estivill et al, 2017; Martin et al, 2017) or on planar films that are representative of the processing used to create the source/drain SiGe and a correlation between the planar film and device is developed. And while atom probe tomography (APT) is perhaps the best-suited technique for providing B dopant distributions in state-of-the-art semiconductor devices, the resulting measurements currently fall into the category described above: known to be inaccurate, but with a generally precise offset from correlative characterization techniques, particularly SIMS, which is often considered the “gold standard” within the semiconductor industry for B measurements in Si and SiGe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is used to measure B in SiGe, but performing SIMS on a full-build device is very tricky if even possible. As a result, SIMS is usually performed on simplified three-dimensional structures (Kambham et al, 2011; Martin et al, 2016; Estivill et al, 2017; Martin et al, 2017) or on planar films that are representative of the processing used to create the source/drain SiGe and a correlation between the planar film and device is developed. And while atom probe tomography (APT) is perhaps the best-suited technique for providing B dopant distributions in state-of-the-art semiconductor devices, the resulting measurements currently fall into the category described above: known to be inaccurate, but with a generally precise offset from correlative characterization techniques, particularly SIMS, which is often considered the “gold standard” within the semiconductor industry for B measurements in Si and SiGe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APT has matured rapidly in the field of semiconductor devices and is increasingly used to provide advanced measurements directly on the source/drain SiGe of devices, particularly fin-shaped field-effect transistors (FinFETs) (Takamizawa et al, 2012; Kambham et al, 2013; Grenier et al, 2014; Martin et al, 2016; Parikh et al, 2017; Martin et al, 2018). However, these long held concerns over the accuracy of APT measurements of B due to discrepancies with SIMS analysis (Thompson et al, 2006; Estivill et al, 2017) need to be better understood and, if possible, resolved. While a few have claimed to achieve good matching between APT and SIMS (Izumida et al, 2011; Kambham et al, 2011), these results are in the minority and a physical explanation for discrepancies (or matching) between APT and SIMS is still debated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few have claimed to achieve good matching between APT and SIMS 17,18 while other claims to have huge gap. 9,19 The different observation on APT loading could be attributed to the multi hit event on different range of dopant concentration used in the respective study, leading to different conclusion and understandings. In comparison with nonfield evaporate preferential species like As, deviation as small as 4% was observed in As dose of 7e14 atom/cm 2 .…”
Section: Figure 1 B Dose Calculated By the Integrated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our current study provides physical explanation to the controversial reports of the discrepancy in concentration/dose comparing APT and SIMS technique. A few have claimed to achieve good matching between APT and SIMS while other claims to have huge gap . The different observation on APT loading could be attributed to the multi hit event on different range of dopant concentration used in the respective study, leading to different conclusion and understandings.…”
Section: B Dose Loading Between Sims and Aptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation