1977
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1977.tb00631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boredom as an Antagonist of Creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The opportunity for thought and reflection was the most frequently mentioned, followed by the opportunity for relaxation. The increased reflectiveness made possible by a state of boredom is congruent with Geller's (1994) suggestion that boredom can be interpreted as a source of information, and the use of boredom to increase creativity is consistent with Schubert's (1977Schubert's ( , 1978 conclusion that "boredom may lead to increased creativity in situations which require people to give serial responses" (Schubert, 1977, p. 239). The identification of relaxation as a possible positive consequence of boredom is interesting in light of Sawin and Scerbo's (1995) finding that identifying a vigilance task as a relaxation task rather than a detection task produced subjective evaluations of the task as lighter on stress and overall workload.…”
Section: Relationships Among Boredom Proneness Mood Monitoring Moodsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The opportunity for thought and reflection was the most frequently mentioned, followed by the opportunity for relaxation. The increased reflectiveness made possible by a state of boredom is congruent with Geller's (1994) suggestion that boredom can be interpreted as a source of information, and the use of boredom to increase creativity is consistent with Schubert's (1977Schubert's ( , 1978 conclusion that "boredom may lead to increased creativity in situations which require people to give serial responses" (Schubert, 1977, p. 239). The identification of relaxation as a possible positive consequence of boredom is interesting in light of Sawin and Scerbo's (1995) finding that identifying a vigilance task as a relaxation task rather than a detection task produced subjective evaluations of the task as lighter on stress and overall workload.…”
Section: Relationships Among Boredom Proneness Mood Monitoring Moodsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Interestingly, in spite of the implicit assumption held by many that the state of boredom is one that almost everyone experiences at some time (Ahmed, 1990;Bernstein, 1975;Bryant & Zillman, 1984;Damrad-Frye & Laird, 1989;Farmer & Sundberg, 1986;Fisher, 1993;Leong & Schneller, 1993;Sawin & Scerbo, 1995;Schubert, 1977), 10% of the respondents volunteered that they were never bored. The fact that these individuals scored lower on mood monitoring than did the other respondents could suggest that a focus on one's emotional state may lead to boredom or, alternatively, that people who never introspect are unable to recognize when they are bored.…”
Section: Relationships Among Boredom Proneness Mood Monitoring Moodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boredom is an immensely powerful motivator of people's actions, for both better and worse. It may inspire the most trivial and meaningful of acts, from doodling (Andrade, 2010;Maclay, Guttman, & Mayer-Gross, 1938) and bursts of creativity (Baird, Smallwood, Mrazek, Kam, Franklin, & Schooler, 2012;Harris, 2000;Schubert, 1977Schubert, , 1978 to self-destructive drug use (Lee, Neighbors, & Woods, 2007), compulsive gambling (Mercer & Eastwood, 2010), and even self-harm (Barbalet, 1999;Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007).…”
Section: -David Foster Wallacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boredom is an immensely powerful motivator of people's actions, for both better and worse. It may inspire the most trivial and meaningful of acts, from doodling (Andrade, 2010;Maclay, Guttman, & Mayer-Gross, 1938) and bursts of creativity (Baird, Smallwood, Mrazek, Kam, Franklin, & Schooler, 2012;Harris, 2000;Schubert, 1977Schubert, , 1978 to self-destructive drug use (Lee, Neighbors, & Woods, 2007), compulsive gambling (Mercer & Eastwood, 2010), and even self-harm (Barbalet, 1999;Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007).…”
Section: -David Foster Wallacementioning
confidence: 99%