2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Border prices and retail prices

Abstract: We analyze retail prices and at-the-dock (import) prices of speci…c items in the Bureau of Labor Statistics'(BLS) CPI and IPP databases, using both databases simultaneously to identify items that are identical in description at the dock and when sold at retail. This identi…cation allows us to measure the distribution wedge associated with bringing traded goods from the point of entry into the United States to their retail outlet. We …nd that overall U.S. distribution wedges are 50-70%, around 10 to 20 percenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
5
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that import prices are lower than final sales prices, as given by equation 14, is consistent with the empirical findings of Berger et al (2012). This pricing approach, among other model features, is also similar to that of Drozd and Nosal (2012), who use a trade model with search frictions to account for several pricing puzzles of international macroeconomics.…”
Section: Bargaining Over Pricesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that import prices are lower than final sales prices, as given by equation 14, is consistent with the empirical findings of Berger et al (2012). This pricing approach, among other model features, is also similar to that of Drozd and Nosal (2012), who use a trade model with search frictions to account for several pricing puzzles of international macroeconomics.…”
Section: Bargaining Over Pricesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The median of this distribution in the model for goods imported to the United States from Colombia is almost 10 percent. Berger et al (2012) find that aggregate wedges between U.S. retail prices and prices at the dock, which include ''both retail and distributor markups and local distribution and marketing costs,'' are around 50 to 70 percent. Since our model does not feature local distribution costs, it explains only about 20 percent of this aggregate wedge, but also suggests that about 80 percent of the aggregate wedge can be attributed to local distribution and marketing costs.…”
Section: Calibration Outcomes and Non-targeted Momentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While their data set allows for a more disaggregated calculation of the distribution shares, it does not include services, which constitutes a large fraction of consumption expenditure. Consistent with equation (1) in the model section below, Burstein, Neves, and Rebelo (2003) and Berger et al (2012) found that the distribution shares are stable over time.…”
Section: The Datasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Instead of estimating the size of the distribution sector using aggregate data, Berger et al. (2012) measured the distribution shares using U.S. retail and import prices of specific items from the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) and producer price index (PPI) data. They find that the distribution shares in these data are larger (on average) than the estimates reported for U.S. consumption goods using aggregate data.…”
Section: A Brief Monetary History Of Ecuadormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the two measures differ in their treatment of tariffs, and while imports are in the national accounts reported at border values, the latter measure using retail or market prices might be closer to political economy objectives concerned with the market shares of foreign products. See also Berger et al () for an instructive empirical investigation into US border prices versus retail prices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%