2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting solar water oxidation activity of BiVO4 photoanode through an efficient in-situ selective surface cation exchange strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While values below 0.3 eV are calculated for all Ba atoms of the slab with TiO 2 terminations (see Figure 4, left), two sets of values are predicted for the slab with BaO terminations (see Figure 4, right). A δ CLBE of −1.4 eV is calculated for the Ba atoms in the two terminal layers (1 and 11), while a δ CLBE below −0.2 eV is found for all the inner layers (3,5,7,9). Even though only initial state effects are considered in this theoretical approach, the calculated core level shift of ∼1.4 eV between the surface layer and the buried ones in the BaO terminated slab is in very good agreement with the experimental shift of 1.25 eV between the Ba(α) and Ba(β) components, as well as with previous results.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While values below 0.3 eV are calculated for all Ba atoms of the slab with TiO 2 terminations (see Figure 4, left), two sets of values are predicted for the slab with BaO terminations (see Figure 4, right). A δ CLBE of −1.4 eV is calculated for the Ba atoms in the two terminal layers (1 and 11), while a δ CLBE below −0.2 eV is found for all the inner layers (3,5,7,9). Even though only initial state effects are considered in this theoretical approach, the calculated core level shift of ∼1.4 eV between the surface layer and the buried ones in the BaO terminated slab is in very good agreement with the experimental shift of 1.25 eV between the Ba(α) and Ba(β) components, as well as with previous results.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 This general trend is also especially important for oxide surfaces. Hence, exchanging surface cation Bi by Co in BiVO 4 photoanodes leads to enhanced photocurrent density with superior stability, 3 polar orientations of crystals can be stabilized by top surface reconstructions or metallic configurations, 4,5 oxide surfaces may exhibit terminations dependent on the oxygen potential, 6 and even the magnetic ordering of a material may be influenced primarily by the surface magnetic long-range ordering provided that its ordering temperature is lower than in the bulk. 7 Generally speaking, the precise knowledge of the extreme surface configuration appears as a major issue and deserves detailed investigation since it can dramatically affect the macroscopic properties of a material.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] However, the fast recombination of the photoinduced charges and the back reactions of the evolved H 2 and O 2 can reduce the energyconversion efficiency. [11][12][13][14] To overcome these key issues, biomass derivatives such as those possessing hydroxyl groups, including methanol, urea, and glycerol, and organic pollutants have recently gained much attention as effective sacrificial agents that can be used to improve the H 2 production yield in PEC systems. [15][16][17] In the PEC process, the photocatalytic oxidation of the sacrificial agents can improve the charge separation by easily forming radicals (-OH) on the catalyst surface and suppressing the H 2 -O 2 back reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPCE was calculated as follows: 35 IPCE = 1240 × I (mA cm −2 )/( P light (mW cm −2 ) × λ (nm))where I is the measured photocurrent density at a specific wavelength, λ is the wavelength of incident light, and P light is the measured light power density at that wavelength. Assuming 100% faradaic efficiency, the applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (ABPE) was calculated using the following equation: 38 ABPE = I (mA cm −2 ) × (1.23 − V bias ) (V)/ P light (mW cm −2 )where I is the photocurrent density, V bias is the applied potential, and P light is the incident illumination power density (100 mW cm −2 ). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots were obtained at 1.23 V ( vs. RHE) with a small AC amplitude of 10 mV in the frequency range of 10 −2 to 10 5 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge separation efficiency ( η separation ) was calculated using the equation: 38 η separation = J sulfite / J abs .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%