2017 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/dicta.2017.8227413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting Sensitivity of a Retinal Vessel Segmentation Algorithm with Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Year Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy 2nd human observer Not available 0.8952 0.9385 0.9349 Hoover et al [8] 2000 0.6734 0.9568 0.9267 Jiang and Mojon [33] 2003 Not available Not available 0.9009 Martinez-Perez et al [31] 2007 0.7506 0.9569 0.9410 Al-Rawi et al [29] 2007 Not available Not available 0.9090 Palomera-Pérez et al [32] 2010 0.769 0.944 0.926 Budai et al [30] 2013 0.5800 0.9820 0.9370 Chakraborti et al [2] 2014 0.6786 0.9586 0.9379 Soomro et al [20] 2017 0.7480 0.9220 0.9480 Abdallah et al [17] 2018 0.6801 0.9711 0.9388 Leopold et al [21] 2019 0.6433 0.9472 0.9045 Proposed method 2019 0.7581 0.9550 0.9401…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Year Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy 2nd human observer Not available 0.8952 0.9385 0.9349 Hoover et al [8] 2000 0.6734 0.9568 0.9267 Jiang and Mojon [33] 2003 Not available Not available 0.9009 Martinez-Perez et al [31] 2007 0.7506 0.9569 0.9410 Al-Rawi et al [29] 2007 Not available Not available 0.9090 Palomera-Pérez et al [32] 2010 0.769 0.944 0.926 Budai et al [30] 2013 0.5800 0.9820 0.9370 Chakraborti et al [2] 2014 0.6786 0.9586 0.9379 Soomro et al [20] 2017 0.7480 0.9220 0.9480 Abdallah et al [17] 2018 0.6801 0.9711 0.9388 Leopold et al [21] 2019 0.6433 0.9472 0.9045 Proposed method 2019 0.7581 0.9550 0.9401…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A u-net architecture is proposed in [19], which requires very few annotated images. Soomro et al [20] presented a method using deep conventional neural networks along with hysteresis threshold method for accurate detection of the narrowly low-contrast vessels. Leopold et al [21] proposed an efficient depth method for automatic segmentation of fundus morphology called Pix-elBNN, which can be well implemented even in the case of severe information loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the consistency of the tables, the Table XIII below does not contain these parameters AUC in articles Soomro et al [101], Chudzik et al [103], Hajabdollahi et al [102], Guo et al [104], Sengür et al [110], Feng et al [112], Soomro et al [114] and AU ROC parameter in articles Mo et al [108], Lahiri et al [109], Wang et al [132], Wu et al [125] and PPV in article Feng et al [112] and visual comparison in article Gu et al [133]. It contains only Acc, Se and Sp.…”
Section: H Supervised Learning Algorithms and Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second step, deep-learning-based semantic segmentation was applied to extract the vessels. Finally, post-processing was used to refine the segmentation [46]. Guo et al proposed a multi-level and multi-scale approach, where short-cut connections were used for the semantic segmentation of vessels and semantic information was passed to forward layers to improve the performance [47].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%