2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Booming or emerging? China's technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dominique Guellec and de la Potteris (2001) proposed three indicators, i.e., SHIA, SHAI, and SHII to measure degree of internationalization and found the degree of technological internationalization is higher for small countries and for countries with low technological intensity [38]. Ma and Lee (2008) utilized co-invention index and co-assignee index to examine the pattern of international collaboration for eight most inventive OECD countries and two Asian countries between 1980 and 2005, a pattern of increasing collaboration in patent across the world over the past two decades were observed [27], and China's international patent had begun to boom along its fast economic growth [39]. Picci (2010) proposed three indicators, InvInv, InvApp, and AppApp, to assess internationalization of European patent between 1990 and 2005, and observed that the level of internationalization, while being rather low, has steadily increased over time.…”
Section: Patent For Investigating International Collaboration Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Dominique Guellec and de la Potteris (2001) proposed three indicators, i.e., SHIA, SHAI, and SHII to measure degree of internationalization and found the degree of technological internationalization is higher for small countries and for countries with low technological intensity [38]. Ma and Lee (2008) utilized co-invention index and co-assignee index to examine the pattern of international collaboration for eight most inventive OECD countries and two Asian countries between 1980 and 2005, a pattern of increasing collaboration in patent across the world over the past two decades were observed [27], and China's international patent had begun to boom along its fast economic growth [39]. Picci (2010) proposed three indicators, InvInv, InvApp, and AppApp, to assess internationalization of European patent between 1990 and 2005, and observed that the level of internationalization, while being rather low, has steadily increased over time.…”
Section: Patent For Investigating International Collaboration Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no direct approach, prior studies utilized indirect approaches which might be limited by incomplete data and thus lead the comparison among countries difficult. Those indirect approaches used in literature for measuring international R&D were, for example, foreign direct investments in R&D [33], foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories [34], foreign-owned R&D facilities [33], outsourced offshore R&D service [35], employees mobility [36,37], R&D and innovation surveys for obtaining up-to-date and detailed company-level data [23], patent citation [19], and international co-patenting [27,28,38,39]. In addition, the relationship between innovation and internationalization [40] was compared and a framework for analyzing different patterns of internationalization of R&D and innovation was proposed [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhenzhong Ma et al (2009) evaluate China's technological capacity and frequency of international research cooperation using data on joint patent applications between China and other OECD countries submitted to the USPTO. Chia-Wen Hsu (2015) uses the intensity and diversity of national high-tech ventures as measures of innovation outcomes and R&D internationalization.…”
Section: Literature On the Internationalization Of Randd Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patent data can also be used in the study of international technological cooperation [43]. Scholars have studied international technological collaboration by patent data from various angles, including the collaboration network [21,44,45], collaboration pattern [20], driving factors [46], knowledge flow [24], industrial degree [25], national degree [47,48], etc. Although the academia has actively promoted the research of international technological collaboration and ICM industrial innovation by patent analysis, ICM international technological collaboration studies using patent data are not yet fully developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%