1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00181074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free flight paths are chosen with an exponential probability density [34] and a mean value determined by the target density and p max [35]. In IMSIL, the maximum impact parameter p max and consequently the mean free flight paths are taken to depend on the energy in such a way that all nuclear energy transfers down to a specified threshold are considered [36].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The free flight paths are chosen with an exponential probability density [34] and a mean value determined by the target density and p max [35]. In IMSIL, the maximum impact parameter p max and consequently the mean free flight paths are taken to depend on the energy in such a way that all nuclear energy transfers down to a specified threshold are considered [36].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IM-SIL the ions start at a distance p max outside the target such that their undeflected direction of motion goes through the origin. Positions of potential collision partners are determined in the usual way, but target atoms are generated at these positions only if they are inside the user-defined surface [35]. Such an algorithm is most likely not applied in SRIM which might account for its failure to correctly predict glancing angle sputter yields [37].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 This method supposes that the majority of the ion induced alteration is due to ballistic mixing ͑which assumption is satisfied for this case, since the other important distorting process the surface roughening results in less than 1 nm rms roughness using the earlier sputtering parameters͒, 18 which is properly described by TRIM simulation. 17,19 The method also considers the intrinsic interface roughness or waviness by a Gaussian broadening. Figure 2 shows one period of the measured depth profiles for the as received and annealed specimens, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ge negative-ion beam at a diameter of 8 mm was implanted in 50-nm SiO2 three times at different energies of 50, 20 and 10 keV to make a plateau of Ge concentration in depth direction of the layer. Fig.2 shows various depth profiles of Ge atoms calculated by TRIM-DYN [8], where the profile has a plateau at Ge 3 at.% from 15 to 42 nm in depth.…”
Section: Experimental 21 Very Thin Sio2 Layer and Ge Negative-ion Immentioning
confidence: 99%