2013
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone‐to‐Implant Contact Around Immediately Loaded Direct Laser Metal‐Forming Transitional Implants in Human Posterior Maxilla

Abstract: The present data obtained in humans showed that, although both IL and UI presented good BIC%, IL DLMF implants had a higher BIC% in the posterior maxilla.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
49
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the scientific literature supports the concept that micro-movements transmitted by occlusal forces and oral tissues (lips, cheeks, tongue) to the bone-implant interface, above a certain threshold, may jeopardize osseointegration, and determine the mobilization and failure of the implant [5,6,7,8,9,12,13]. Finally, in our present SEM study, we report on the results obtained with an implant of standard dimensions (3.5 mm diameter × 10 mm length), and not with transitional nor temporary implants of reduced dimensions, like in previous studies [16,19]. This may represent an additional advantage of our study, because we have evaluated how the healing processes take place in a real situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the scientific literature supports the concept that micro-movements transmitted by occlusal forces and oral tissues (lips, cheeks, tongue) to the bone-implant interface, above a certain threshold, may jeopardize osseointegration, and determine the mobilization and failure of the implant [5,6,7,8,9,12,13]. Finally, in our present SEM study, we report on the results obtained with an implant of standard dimensions (3.5 mm diameter × 10 mm length), and not with transitional nor temporary implants of reduced dimensions, like in previous studies [16,19]. This may represent an additional advantage of our study, because we have evaluated how the healing processes take place in a real situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The best way to evaluate osseointegration in vivo is to retrieve an osseointegrated implant from the human native bone and to analyze the bone-implant interface histologically and istomorphometrically [14,16,19,21]. Obviously, this type of evaluation can be difficult for ethical reasons, and often temporary, mini-implants that are easier to retrieve are used in these studies [14,16,19,21,32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations