2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01677.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging

Abstract: The results of this study suggest that fractal analysis and bone area measurement have potential to evaluate bone quality on CBCT images, while density measurement does not seem to be valid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
126
2
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
126
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…31 With regard to the correlation between FD and lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA (t-score), it was observed that there was a negative significant correlation between FD and BMD of the lumbar spine. In support to our results, Hua et al 32 evaluated decalcified bone samples in relation to DXA using CBCT and found a negative correlation between FD and bone density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…31 With regard to the correlation between FD and lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA (t-score), it was observed that there was a negative significant correlation between FD and BMD of the lumbar spine. In support to our results, Hua et al 32 evaluated decalcified bone samples in relation to DXA using CBCT and found a negative correlation between FD and bone density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Nonetheless, the superior radiographic imaging properties of CBCT have led to an increase in application of the technology among dental practitioners (27). Furthermore, research on the evaluation of jaw bones using CBCT CT value measurements (6,10,9,28), radiomorphometric indices (15) and computer software is ongoing (29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal dimension, and its relation with bone architecture, has been investigated on in vitro, animal and clinical CBCT images. [23][24][25][26] Various other studies have measured morphometric and other parameters, correlating values from CBCT with those from mCT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. [27][28][29][30][31] Correlation coefficients were typically interpreted as "high".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%