Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary trabecular bone in dental implant sites

Wakimoto, Mari; Matsumura, Tatsushi; Ueno, Takaaki; Mizukawa, Nobuyoshi; Yanagi, Yoshinobu; Iida, Seiji

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02347.x

Cited by 54 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the recent spread of CB-CT had led to a rise in the accuracy of bone data for implant placement sites 5,6) . Wakimoto et al examined CT attenuation during artificial filling of jawbones following tooth extraction (socket preservation) and reported the efficacy of HU evaluation during implant placement 7) .…”

Section: Comparison Of Histological Results and Ct Attenuationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Ridge for Dental Implant Placement Using a Nondecalcified Frozen Section Technique

Takahashi

Kanou

Ito

et al. 2017

J. Hard Tissue Biology.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implant therapy has been established as an excellent therapeutic method for the recovery of masticatory function. However, no reports to date have undertaken detailed analyses of jaw bone quality using bone biopsy despite the large impact that jaw bone quality at the implant placement sites has on the prognosis of implant therapy. This study histologically examined jaw bone quality at implant placement sites using nondecalcified frozen sections. We also compared bone quality with attenuation (measured in Hounsfield units (HU)) on computed tomography (CT). Bone quality was highest around the anterior mandibular (67.25%), followed by the anterior maxillary (60.23%), mandibular molars (55.14%) and maxillary molars (44.81%). No statistical correlation with CT attenuation was evident (mean, 540.91 HU). These results suggested that consideration needs to be given to histological diagnosis as well as CT attenuation in clinical evaluations of bone where implant bodies should be placed.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Histological Results and Ct Attenuationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Ridge for Dental Implant Placement Using a Nondecalcified Frozen Section Technique

Takahashi

Kanou

Ito

et al. 2017

J. Hard Tissue Biology.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A large number of measurements performed could compensate for this imperfection as well. For implants anchorage, not only bone volume, but quality of the bone is also significant (27). Finally, it is necessary to note that presented numeric values evaluate only one half of each maxilla.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of the Interantral Bone in Implant Dentistry using Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Human Radiographic Study

Kopecka¹,

Šimůneḱ²,

Streblov³

et al. 2014

West Indian Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bone volume in the horizontal and vertical dimensions was assessed by clinician observation during the implant placement in the ideal restorative driven position. By degree of deficient ridge volume in apical, horizontal patterns, there were characterized up to 8 classes [21]. Recently, this classification was modified and regrouped into four types, as shown in Figure 2.…”

Section: Basic Information About Bone Density In Human Jawbonesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Type IV is a case with insufficient alveolar heights and width with all sides of implant, are exposed. Type IV is a complete opposite of Type I in this category [21]. experience and implant shape/structure reflecting drilling assessment in each study will be involved in the assessment and outcome.…”

Section: Basic Information About Bone Density In Human Jawbonesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reference and Techniques used in Alveolar Bone Classification

Seriwatanachai

Kiattavorncharoen²,

Suriyan³

et al. 2015

J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The marginal bone loss that usually observed around dental implant has been well documented and expected. It has related with self-reaction to the forensic body of each patient as well as the osseointegrated interface. Bone quantity and quality of the implant site may help to define the implant-bone interface, which in turn affects primary stability of the immediate implant placement. Analysis of bone quality prior to surgery provides vital information during treatment planning for dental implant. Additionally, it helps in predicting postsurgical success. The classification of bone quality, however, is difficult to follow clinically, as tactile assessments are subject to the variation among surgeons. Although imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) or cone bean computed tomography (CBCT), are useful to determine bone quality, the exposure to radiation and its precision, are still of concern. This paper reviews common techniques and reference used in dental bone classification as well as the recent reports from histomorphometric analysis and molecular components. It is well acknowledged that clinical awareness of evaluating the amounts of bone surrounding the implant site by appropriate method is critical for a successful outcome.

show abstract

Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary trabecular bone in dental implant sites

Abstract: An assessment of bone quality in the anterior alveolar ridge may well reflect age-related systemic pathological conditions and should be used in dental implant treatment planning to avoid associated risk factors.

Cited by 54 publications

References 29 publications

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Ridge for Dental Implant Placement Using a Nondecalcified Frozen Section Technique

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Ridge for Dental Implant Placement Using a Nondecalcified Frozen Section Technique

Measurement of the Interantral Bone in Implant Dentistry using Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Human Radiographic Study

Reference and Techniques used in Alveolar Bone Classification

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About