2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone mineral density of the proximal tibia relates to axial torsion in the lower limb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal structure of 3D proximal tibia of young normal people was simulated to validate the method used in this paper. Comparing the simulated results in Table 1 with the observations in the literature, it can be seen that the average BMD ratio of ROI1 to ROI2 in the simulated result of internal structure of 3D proximal tibia for young normal people is consistent with the result of young healthy people in the same area measured by Hudson et al [47]. Hence with the method used in this paper the BMD distribution of 3D proximal tibia can be simulated more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The internal structure of 3D proximal tibia of young normal people was simulated to validate the method used in this paper. Comparing the simulated results in Table 1 with the observations in the literature, it can be seen that the average BMD ratio of ROI1 to ROI2 in the simulated result of internal structure of 3D proximal tibia for young normal people is consistent with the result of young healthy people in the same area measured by Hudson et al [47]. Hence with the method used in this paper the BMD distribution of 3D proximal tibia can be simulated more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…From the simulation results of proximal tibia of young normal people it can be seen that the average BMDs in ROI1 and ROI2 are 1.23 g/cm 3 and 1.03 g/cm 3 , and the M:L BMD Ratio is 1.19. While for the same ROIs, the proximal tibial BMDs of 30 young healthy people were measured by Hudson et al [47], and the obtained average M:L BMD Ratio was 1.20 ± 0.10. Thus it can be seen that the simulated M:L BMD Ratio in this paper is consistent with that measured by Hudson et al [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various noninvasive studies have attempted to quantify the alterations in bone anatomy in response to altered mechanical loading using scintigraphy (7), bone densitometry (8–10), fractal radiography (11), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (12). Recently, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the tibial condyles of healthy subjects (13, 14), random populations (15, 16), subjects with radiographic knee OA (17–20), and subjects with symptomatic knee OA (5, 21–24). The advantage of this measurement is that the BMD value increases in the subchondral bone of tibial condyles prior to radiographic progression (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%