2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone marrow aspirate combined with low-level laser therapy: A new therapeutic approach to enhance bone healing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
53
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Histomorphometric analysis revealed significant differences in favor of Group AFGL when compared to Group AFG at all postoperative periods, with a thinner interface. The neovascularization and thermic and biological stimuli provided by LLLT can lead to better graft integration [32,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histomorphometric analysis revealed significant differences in favor of Group AFGL when compared to Group AFG at all postoperative periods, with a thinner interface. The neovascularization and thermic and biological stimuli provided by LLLT can lead to better graft integration [32,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of bone marrow aspirate/LLL yielded significantly greater bone formation in surgically created critical-size defects in rat calvaria[11]. LLL was applied as an adjunct therapy for MSCs transplantation on the functional recovery of crushed sciatic nerve in rats[12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Mouraret S et al, when comparing ultrasonic surgical instruments and a fissure carbide bur, used reported that no obvious differences were found in the extent or duration of postoperative inflammation 25) . PCNA-positive cells are used as an indicator of cell proliferation 26,27) and OC is used as an indicator of osteoblast activity in the later stages of osteogenesis 26) . In this study, we compared the bone healing process using these two assessment methods, and no difference was found in the healing process.…”
Section: Healing Process After Bone Cuttingmentioning
confidence: 99%