2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2008-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study

Abstract: Loading of the skeleton can be achieved through weight-bearing exercise which is important for the development of a functionally and mechanically appropriate bone structure. Our objectives were to determine hip cross-sectional geometry in elite male athletes (n=54) subjected to different loading modalities (gymnastics, endurance running and swimming) and non-athletic, age-matched controls (n=20). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA, GE Healthcare, UK) measurements of the total body (for body composition) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SM increases as the femur expands in diameter by subperiosteal apposition, an effect reported following weight-bearing exercise interventions (20) and in observational studies of athletes compared to controls (21). Given the superior bone geometrical properties in rugby players, overall bone strength in this group is likely to be adequate for their loading demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…SM increases as the femur expands in diameter by subperiosteal apposition, an effect reported following weight-bearing exercise interventions (20) and in observational studies of athletes compared to controls (21). Given the superior bone geometrical properties in rugby players, overall bone strength in this group is likely to be adequate for their loading demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Maneuvers performed during artistic gymnastics expose the skeleton to dynamic loads and high ground reaction forces at both the upper and lower body (Dolan et al, 2006;Wade et al, 2012;Weeks and Beck, 2008). Alternatively, participation in nonweight bearing activities such as swimming is associated with minimal skeletal benefits (Hind et al, 2012). Bone mineral accrued during the early years of life may benefit bone strength into young adulthood, suggesting the importance of physical activity recall methods that are specific to skeletal loading and comprise total lifetime loading activities (Baxter-Jones et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Questionnaires designed to assess energy expenditure alone may not correlate with bone outcomes due to the lack of specificity with respect to skeletal loading. As an example, activities such as swimming likely require a high level of energy expenditure; however, the bone stimulating effects are minimal (Hind et al, 2012;Lazar et al, 2013). To capture bone-stimulating characteristics of individual activities, two recall questionnaires were developed, i.e., the Bone Loading History Questionnaire (BLHQ) and the Bone-Specific Physical Activity Questionnaire (BPAQ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this holding-up of the right leg for relief leads over time to lower BMd in the right femur, seen in all experimental groups except group mu21. the bone loading is necessary to prevent bone loss (17) and the bone structure can be achieved through impact exercise (18). in contrast, prolonged inactivity leads to atrophy, loss of muscle and bone mass (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%