Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel

Poitevin, André; Munck, Jan De; Ende, Annelies Van; Suyama, Yuji; Mine, Atsushi; Peumans, Marleen; Meerbeek, Bart Van

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.001

Cited by 114 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

104

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This was also supported by other studies that have shown that water trees, water bubbles and phase separation occurred in the adhesive interface of self etch adhesives. These results were in agreement with many authors (30)(31)(32)(33) stating that resin/dentin bonds degrade overtime. Many factors can cause the degradation; among them are exposure to water, incomplete hybridization and residual solvent of the adhesive (34) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

In-vivo Bond Degradation Resistance and In-vitro Degree of Conversion of Bulk Fill Versus Nano Filled Resin Composite Restoratives

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate bulk fill and nanohybrid resin composite at different cavity depth and after different testing periods. Materials & methods:Standardized simple box class II occluso-mesial (OM) cavities were prepared in the selected first maxillary premolar in each quadrant. The cavity depth was adjusted to be either 2mm or 4mm in each patient. For the bulkfill composite, both the two and four-millimeters cavities, one increment of the resin composite material (Xtra-fil) was packed inside the cavity while for the nanohybrid resin composite (Grandio), the four millimeters cavities were filled incrementally by packing two increments of 2mm thickness while for the two millimeters cavities one increment (2mm) was packed to fill the cavity and light cured for 20 seconds, finished, polished and left for the assigned time. The restored tooth was extracted atraumatically and teeth were sectioned to produce beam-shaped specimens of (1 ± 0.1 mm 2 ). The beam specimens were attached with cyanoacrylate gel to fit the Instron Universal testing machine. The tensile load was applied at a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/minute until specimen failure occurred. At this point the failure load in Newton was recorded.Results: Cavity depth of 2 mm showed the highest significant mean microtensile bond strength compared with that of 4 mm. Nanohybrid resin composite showed the highest significant mean micro tensile compared with Bulkfill resin composite. The testing period of 24 hours showed highest significant mean microtensile bond strength that one tested after 3 and 6 months. Conclusion:(1) cavity depth has an apparent influence on tensile bond strength of the tested restoratives to dentin. (2) Microtensile bond strength of the tested restorations deteriorates by aging.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

In-vivo Bond Degradation Resistance and In-vitro Degree of Conversion of Bulk Fill Versus Nano Filled Resin Composite Restoratives

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second null hypothesis was rejected too, as the spacer chain length and hydrophilicity also influenced the bonding performance of the experimental 1-SEAs tested. The acidic functional monomer plays a key role in self-etch adhesives [7], self-adhesive luting agents [17] and selfadhesive (flowable) composites [18]. Besides etching, thereby providing micro-retention, specific functional monomers have also shown to interact chemically (ionically) with calcium and hydroxyapatite of enamel and dentin [11,19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of hydrophilicity and length of spacer chains on the bonding of functional monomers

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Para este estudo, de acordo com as instruções dos fabricantes, o esmalte hígido e o esmalte desgastado foram condicionados com ácido fosfórico nas amostras do grupo controle e, adicionalmente, condicionados com ácido fosfórico nos grupos DF. De acordo com Van Meerbeek et al 3 (2003), o condicionamento ácido prévio do esmalte melhora significativamente a efetividade da união, uma vez que o ácido fosfórico aumenta a energia de superfície do esmalte e proporciona mais microrretenção 22 . Conforme pode ser observado nas Tabelas 1 e 2, para o produto DF, houve diferença estatística entre o esmalte hígido e o esmalte desgastado, com maior resistência de união para o esmalte desgastado, para ambos os tempos.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Resistência de união e degradação de um compósito fluido autoaderente em substratos dentais e um compósito restaurador

Garcia

Werlich

Costa

et al. 2016

Rev. da Fac. de Odontologia, UPF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel

Cited by 114 publications

References 29 publications

In-vivo Bond Degradation Resistance and In-vitro Degree of Conversion of Bulk Fill Versus Nano Filled Resin Composite Restoratives

In-vivo Bond Degradation Resistance and In-vitro Degree of Conversion of Bulk Fill Versus Nano Filled Resin Composite Restoratives

Impact of hydrophilicity and length of spacer chains on the bonding of functional monomers

Resistência de união e degradação de um compósito fluido autoaderente em substratos dentais e um compósito restaurador

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About