Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine

Hanabusa, Masao; Mine, Atsushi; Kuboki, Takuo; Momoi, Yasuko; Ende, Annelies Van; Meerbeek, Bart Van; Munck, Jan De

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012

Cited by 316 publications

(311 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

255

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the selective etch technique is especially recommended for MDP-containing universal adhesives. However, our results are in contrast with a previous study on 10-MDP based adhesives reporting that phosphoric acid etching of dentin prior to adhesive application significantly decreased the bond strength to dentine [17]. The results of this study clearly indicated that the performance of SBU was dependent on the adhesive strategy.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, a new type of one-step SE adhesive resin has been introduced, classified as "universal" or "multi-mode" adhesive that could be applied either with TE or SE technique [17,18]. These systems were introduced with manufacturer's claims that one monomer solution could be used for either adhesive strategy, without compromising the bonding effectiveness and thereby, being able to replace existing simplified adhesive resins [15,16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?

Kuşdemir

Çetin

Özsoy

et al. 2015

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The objectives of this study were to investigate the adhesion of a universal adhesive used either in total-etch or self-etch mode with and without 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant (CHX) or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate (NaF/HEMA) to dentin. Dentin surfaces of extracted human non-carious third molar teeth (N=18) were exposed and randomly assigned to two groups. Half of the teeth were conditioned with total-etch and the other with self-etch adhesive mode. The teeth were then randomly divided into two groups where half were cleaned with 2% CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco, CC) and the other half with NaF/HEMA (Aqua Prep F, Bisco, APF). Control groups in total-etch (C1) and self-etch (C2) adhesive system did not receive any cavity disinfectant.Dentin surfaces were conditioned with universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, SBU) and resin composite blocks (3M Z550) were bonded incrementally on the conditioned dentin using a mould. The teeth were stored in water for 48 h and from each tooth beam-shaped specimens (1 mm 2 ) were prepared (n=14, per group). Microtensile bond strength (MBS) was were predominantly adhesive between the dentin and the adhesive resin. Mixed failures were more common for both C1 and C2 and total etch-CC combination.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?

Kuşdemir

Çetin

Özsoy

et al. 2015

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, prior application of phosphoric acid with multi-mode adhesives improved the bond strength to enamel but negatively affected the dentin hybridization quality. 8 It is still controversial whether acid etching prior to the application of 1-stepSE adhesives affects the respective dentin bond strengths. [9][10][11][12] One-step SE adhesives result in thin adhesive layers that are prone to polymerization inhibition by oxygen.…”

Section: Adhesive)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Adhesive Properties to Dentin and Enamel of a Universal Adhesive Associated With a Hydrophobic Resin Coat

Perdigão

Muñoz

Sezinando

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-mode adhesives may be optimized when they are used as self-etch adhesives on dentin with a separate enamel etching step. SUMMARYObjectives: To evaluate the effect of acid etching and application of a hydrophobic resin coat on the enamel/dentin bond strengths and degree of conversion (DC) within the hybrid layer of a universal adhesive system (G-Bond Plus [GB]).Methods: A total of 60 extracted third molars were divided into four groups for bondstrength testing, according to the adhesive strategy: GB applied as a one-step self-etch adhesive (1-stepSE); GB applied as in 1-stepSE followed by one coat of the hydrophobic resin Heliobond (2-stepSE); GB applied as a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (2-stepER); GB applied as in 2-stepER followed by one coat of the hydrophobic resin Heliobond (3-stepER). There were 40 teeth used for enamel microshear bond strength (lSBS) and DC; and 20 teeth used for dentin microtensile bond strength (lTBS) and DC. After restorations were constructed, specimens were stored in water (378C/24 h) and then tested at 0.5 mm/min (lTBS) or 1.0 mm/min (lSBS). Enamel-resin

show abstract

“…The concept behind these adhesives is novel; hence, only short-term clinical and immediate ultramorphological and bond strength studies have been reported. [18][19][20] The aims of this randomized double-blind clinical trial were to study the influence of different application strategies on the clinical behavior of a new universal multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) placed in NCCLs, over the course of 18 months, using two evaluation criteria: World Dental Federation (FDI) and United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The null hypotheses tested were: 1) bonding to NCCLs using the self-etch strategy, associated or not with selective enamel etching or using the etch-and-rinse strategy, applied on dry or moist dentin, would result in similar retention rates over 18 months of clinical service, and 2) different evaluation criteria (FDI or USPHS criteria) would not result in different outcomes for the same data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

Perdigão

Kose

Mena-Serrano

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

228

185

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At 18 months, the new multimode adhesive, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, fulfilled the American Dental Association criteria required for full approval. Its clinical behavior is reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy. SUMMARYPurpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria.Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) , 2014, 39-2, 113-127 bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38%, 40%, 36%, and 44% for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p.0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30% of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28%) in comparison with the other groups (8%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set).Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.

show abstract

Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine

Cited by 316 publications

References 30 publications

Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?

Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?

Immediate Adhesive Properties to Dentin and Enamel of a Universal Adhesive Associated With a Hydrophobic Resin Coat

A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About