2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond behavior and shear transfer of steel section-concrete interface with studs: Testing and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the concrete is poured into the composite sections, which are composed of main girders and cross girders welded together. In the proposed composite connection, high-performance PBL connectors are used in place of conventional headed studs, which provide superior long-term performance [12]. In comparison to the other connections mentioned, the innovative composite connection has a more efficient load transfer path and simpler configurations.…”
Section: Novel Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the concrete is poured into the composite sections, which are composed of main girders and cross girders welded together. In the proposed composite connection, high-performance PBL connectors are used in place of conventional headed studs, which provide superior long-term performance [12]. In comparison to the other connections mentioned, the innovative composite connection has a more efficient load transfer path and simpler configurations.…”
Section: Novel Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The headed studs might increase the interfacial bond resistance and shear stiffness, enhance the post-peak bond behavior, and avoid brittle failure, according to Wang et al's push-out studies on SRC specimens. 20 By examining the failure mechanism of the stud connection and the load-slip curve of the UHPC-steel interface, several studies proposed a shear strength formula and a load-slip relationship of embedded ultra-high-performance concrete studs. [21][22][23][24] Different numerical constitutive models and modeling methods (the cracking element method and the cracking particle method) are employed to reflect elastic-plastic mechanics and brittle fracture of the concrete lining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonilla et al created a nonlinear FE push‐out test model to investigate the effects of stud location and concrete strength on the resistance and behavior of shear connections 19 . The headed studs might increase the interfacial bond resistance and shear stiffness, enhance the post‐peak bond behavior, and avoid brittle failure, according to Wang et al's push‐out studies on SRC specimens 20 . By examining the failure mechanism of the stud connection and the load‐slip curve of the UHPC‐steel interface, several studies proposed a shear strength formula and a load‐slip relationship of embedded ultra‐high‐performance concrete studs 21–24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%