2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aae66e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body-weight dependent dose coefficients for adults exposed to idealised external photon fields

Abstract: In epidemiological investigations of cancer risk from occupational exposure, it is important to obtain organ-specific dose for each cohort member for accurate risk analysis. To date, dose conversion coefficients, which convert physical dose measurement to organ dose, are only available for individuals with reference body size which can differentially bias the estimated organ dose depending on the body mass index of cohort members. In the current study, we calculated the organ dose coefficients applicable to ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of uncertainty in the average weight is on the order of ±6% or less (minimum to maximum range) of the nominal weight by age and sex (Thiessen 2017). Based on several recent studies that report dose coefficients for the purpose of estimating radiation doses from medical exposures (Simon 2011, Chang et al 2018, and based on a sensitivity analysis of the dose coefficients derived for this study we expect that the uncertainty in the average organ-specific dose coefficients due to the uncertainty in average body weights for Canadian tuberculosis patients is about ±10%-20% (minimum to maximum range), with narrower uncertainty ranges possible for some organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The magnitude of uncertainty in the average weight is on the order of ±6% or less (minimum to maximum range) of the nominal weight by age and sex (Thiessen 2017). Based on several recent studies that report dose coefficients for the purpose of estimating radiation doses from medical exposures (Simon 2011, Chang et al 2018, and based on a sensitivity analysis of the dose coefficients derived for this study we expect that the uncertainty in the average organ-specific dose coefficients due to the uncertainty in average body weights for Canadian tuberculosis patients is about ±10%-20% (minimum to maximum range), with narrower uncertainty ranges possible for some organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additional MC simulations were performed to calculate the average absorbed doses for six organs and tissues of the male and female phantoms in three different body weights (male: H175W60, H175W90, and H175W130; female: H165W60, H165W90, and H165W130). In order to determine the dose differences between the two libraries, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those produced by (Chang et al 2018) using the corresponding body-size phantoms from the body-size-dependent phantom library developed in collaboration between the University of Florida and the National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) (Geyer et al 2014).…”
Section: Monte Carlo Dose Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 12 plots the ratios of the organ/tissue doses of the phantoms of the same body size (male: H175W60, H175W90, and H175W130; female: H165W60, H165W90, and H165W130) between the MRCP-based phantom library developed in the present study and the UF/NCI phantom library (Chang et al 2018). For the energies >0.1 MeV, the ratios are generally close to unity (mostly between 0.9 and 1.1), meaning that the two libraries provide similar organ/tissue doses for the same body size.…”
Section: Dose Comparison With Another Body-size-dependent Phantom Lib...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…output [36]. The former effect is taken into account in the form of increased P KA , while the latter is not.…”
Section: Errors and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%