2002
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/76.5.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body fat in neonates and young infants: validation of skinfold thickness versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry,,

Abstract: With the use of statistical bootstrap analysis, the results provide an in vivo validation of SFT measurements against DXA for newborns and young infants. Body fat measurements by SFT correlate with FM values determined by DXA (R(2) = 0.936). Estimation of nutritional status is possible with errors (SD) of +/- 75, +/- 170, +/- 300, and +/- 380 g for infants with an FM 2000 g, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
166
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
166
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean of all obtained measures of the anthropometric variables was used. Percentage of body fat was calculated from the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses using the equations of Slaughter et al (19), which may not give an optimal estimate (20), but at a sum of skinfold thicknesses~16 mm as in the present study seems to give a fair estimate of body fat. BMI z scores were calculated from Danish growth curves (21).…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The mean of all obtained measures of the anthropometric variables was used. Percentage of body fat was calculated from the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses using the equations of Slaughter et al (19), which may not give an optimal estimate (20), but at a sum of skinfold thicknesses~16 mm as in the present study seems to give a fair estimate of body fat. BMI z scores were calculated from Danish growth curves (21).…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The body length was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm in the supine position with a length board. Triceps, biceps, suprailiac, and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were measured on the left side of the body with a skinfold caliper (Holtain Ltd, Crosswell, Crymych, UK), according to the procedure reported by Schmelzle and Fusch (2002). Subcutaneous fat accumulation was evaluated as the sum of these four skinfold thicknesses.…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing more accurate information on fetal nutrition than simple weight, skinfold thickness measurements are widely used in the assessment of nutritional status throughout the life course, and offer a fast and non-invasive method of examining body fat mass particularly in newborns. 9,10 A study by Catalano et al 11 that examined 188 singleton term neonates showed that neonatal fat mass constitutes 14% of total birth weight but, explains nearly half of the variance in normal birth weight. Clearly, birth weight cannot be taken as a full proxy marker for neonatal adiposity, and a better understanding of the determinants of adiposity is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%