2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.262959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board Structure in the UK and Germany: Convergence or Continuing Divergence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of firms controlled by institutional owners include Kaufman & Broad and Rexel in France, and Vedanta Resources in the UK. When ownership is diffused, it is difficult for dispersed shareholders to coordinate their monitoring activities and it is not worthwhile for each investor to monitor the company on a continuing basis due to the free-rider problem (Aguilera, 2005;Davies, 2002;Grossman & Hart, 1980). Consequently, the problem of misalignment of interests between shareholders and managers arises, with managers and shareholders having different degrees of access to firmspecific information, and strong managers engaging in selfserving activities that may be detrimental to shareholders' wealth maximization.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Bundles and Roles Of Outside Directors mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of firms controlled by institutional owners include Kaufman & Broad and Rexel in France, and Vedanta Resources in the UK. When ownership is diffused, it is difficult for dispersed shareholders to coordinate their monitoring activities and it is not worthwhile for each investor to monitor the company on a continuing basis due to the free-rider problem (Aguilera, 2005;Davies, 2002;Grossman & Hart, 1980). Consequently, the problem of misalignment of interests between shareholders and managers arises, with managers and shareholders having different degrees of access to firmspecific information, and strong managers engaging in selfserving activities that may be detrimental to shareholders' wealth maximization.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Bundles and Roles Of Outside Directors mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we propose that monitoring by the board of directors will be more important when ownership is diffused. This is so because dispersed shareholders, individually, not only lack the incentives and abilities to monitor management directly, but also find it challenging to coordinate their monitoring efforts (Davies, 2002;Aguilera, 2005). By contrast, controlling shareholders do not typically rely as much on the board to monitor management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berle (1958) documents that some types of ownership structure such as ownership concentration are required to alleviate agency problems. In other words, concentrated ownership monitor management activities directly and possess incentives and abilities to oversight management and hold them for the accountability of actions not align with shareholders' interests (Davies, 2001;Aguilera, 2005). In addition, concentrated ownership works extensively to enhance firms' long-term value creation abilities.…”
Section: Corporate Ownership and Control Structurementioning
confidence: 99%