2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board interlocking network and the design of executive compensation packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggests that, in Brazil, BI measured by the systematics of corporate social networks, as applied by previous research (Chiu et al, 2013, Connelly & Slyke, 2012, Cunha & Piccoli, 2017, Elouaer-Mrizak & Chaand, 2013Fan, Guan, Li, & Yang, 2014;Ribeiro & Colauto, 2016;Santos et al, 2012;Wong et al, 2015) may not have captured the underlying interest of the links to the organizations' strategies, monitoring, and performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggests that, in Brazil, BI measured by the systematics of corporate social networks, as applied by previous research (Chiu et al, 2013, Connelly & Slyke, 2012, Cunha & Piccoli, 2017, Elouaer-Mrizak & Chaand, 2013Fan, Guan, Li, & Yang, 2014;Ribeiro & Colauto, 2016;Santos et al, 2012;Wong et al, 2015) may not have captured the underlying interest of the links to the organizations' strategies, monitoring, and performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…BI research has advanced regarding the way this phenomenon affects businesses. Some examples are the studies relating BI to executive compensation (Wong, Gygax & Wang, 2015), corporate performance (Camilo et al, 2012), investment options, mergers and strategic decisions (Bizjak et al, 2009), earnings smoothing (Ribeiro & Colauto, 2016) and earnings management practices (Chiu, Teoh, & Tian, 2013). However, there are still research gaps resulting from studies that fail in specifying the elements within the BI and considering the nature and behavioral processes of the connected individuals (Gulati & Westphal, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Models (6) and 7, we continue to add moderator variables based on Model (5) to test the impact of political connections on the relationship between ownership concentration and corporate donation.…”
Section: The Empirical Model Of Network Effect On Firm Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several decades, an increasing amount of literature has focused on the influence of networks on corporate operations. Social networks have been used to explain a wide range of outcomes, including performance [1][2][3][4], firm policies [5][6][7], executive compensation [8], knowledge sharing [9,10], innovation [11], and ethical behavior [8,12]. Many scholars have studied the role of corporate philanthropy, an important aspect of a company's strategic decisions, on the enterprise itself and on society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the ERG models, a variety of network Hamiltonians have been studied, which include models of random network [1], reciprocity model of directed network [1], the two star model of network [5,6], and the Strauss model of network with clustering [7,8]. Far more complex Hamiltonians that include endogenous as well as exogenous observables of the network, has also been studied in the social network literature [9,10,11]. Moreover, there are many tools such as ERGM [12] and SIENA [13] packages to fit ERG model with social data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%