The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

36
427
6
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 635 publications
(518 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
36
427
6
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we use two (market and business) measures of corporate risk. To calculate market risk, we follow the measurement method of Bernile, Bhagwat, and Yonker (2018). We calculate industry-adjusted Beta coefficient to measure market risk.…”
Section: The Measurement Of Corporate Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we use two (market and business) measures of corporate risk. To calculate market risk, we follow the measurement method of Bernile, Bhagwat, and Yonker (2018). We calculate industry-adjusted Beta coefficient to measure market risk.…”
Section: The Measurement Of Corporate Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They report evidence that gender diversity appears to hurt firm performance and shareholder wealth. 7 However, more recent work by Kim and Starks (2016) and Bernile et al (2018) emphasizes the diverse skills offered by these new director appointments, and the Eckbo et al (2019) methodological critique of several of these early studies raises serious doubts about the reliability of the conclusion that adding gender diversity to boards has negative performance and valuation effects. Instead, these latter studies suggest that board gender diversity can actually have positive or at least valuation-neutral effects.…”
Section: When Are Gender-diverse Boards Beneficial?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) as the decision controller must be able to prioritize rationality in investment decision making, besides the emotional and psychological factors of the CEO itself. One of the most studied executive board diversity is gender diversity (Bernile, Bhagwat, & Yonker, 2018). Gender diversity can improve the quality of decision making (Campbell & Vera, 2010;Lückerath-Rovers, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of women as executive boards has a positive effect on firm value (Bernile et al, 2018;Campbell & Vera, 2010;Dewi & Dewi, 2016;Hernandez, Ugedo, & Vera, 2015;Lückerath-Rovers, 2013;Triana & Asri, 2017). This positive effect caused by several things.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation