2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BMI is an independent prognostic factor for late outcome in patients diagnosed with early breast cancer: A landmark survival analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 15 patients (13.3%) who received more than one line of ICIs, two patients received anti-PD1 followed by ipilimumab, while the others received ipilimumab followed by anti-PD1. The effect of BMI on OS was not statistically significant (HR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.05, p=0.896) (online supplemental table 4), similar results were obtained considering BMI as a categorical variable (online supplemental table 5). No statistically significant interaction between BMI and gender was found (p value of interaction=0.832).…”
Section: Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Among 15 patients (13.3%) who received more than one line of ICIs, two patients received anti-PD1 followed by ipilimumab, while the others received ipilimumab followed by anti-PD1. The effect of BMI on OS was not statistically significant (HR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.05, p=0.896) (online supplemental table 4), similar results were obtained considering BMI as a categorical variable (online supplemental table 5). No statistically significant interaction between BMI and gender was found (p value of interaction=0.832).…”
Section: Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The strength of this research derives from the methodology used to provide a real and effective lifestyle intervention in BC patients, able to statistically reduce body weight, particularly in overweight and obese women throughout the study period. A better prognosis in obese than in overweight women was seen, in contrast to the vast majority of studies where obesity represented the worst category of patients in terms of death and recurrence [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…At the first visit, women were weighed and height was measured; arm, waist, and hip circumferences, along with the tricipital, bicipital, subscapular, and suprailiac folds were also measured; BMI, defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m 2 ). Based on the BMI, women were grouped into the weight categories recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [46]: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal-weight (BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ). Nutritional history and physical activity (hours/week) were inquired.…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an independent prognostic indicator of tumor-related diseases, BMI has got more and more concern by researchers in recent years. BMI was related with the prognosis of breast carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and so on [20,21]. In this paper, we found that BMI was signi cantly correlated with the prognosis of AEG patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%